Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unocal board won't back CNOOC bid
San Jose Mercury News ^ | 7/15/05

Posted on 07/15/2005 4:00:25 PM PDT by Dane

Unocal board won't back CNOOC bid

Unocal Corp.'s directors refused to support a takeover of their company by CNOOC Ltd., the oil company whose parent is owned by the government of China.

Sources familiar with the bid said the Unocal directors didn't back the unsolicited takeover bid because the CNOOC bid did not raise the Chinese oil company's $18.5 billion cash offer.

San Ramon-based Chevron Corp. (CVX) has offered $16.3 billion in cash and stock to snap up Unocal. Chevron says its bid is superior to CNOOC's because the Chevron bid would close quickly, while CNOOC's proposal faces lengthy government delays. Federal regulators have already approved the Chevron offer.

The battle over Unocal has become entangled in geopolitics and an expanding appetite for crude oil among countries with fast-growing economies such as the United States, China and India

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: California
KEYWORDS: chicoms; china; cnooc; freetraitors; oil; robbingusblind; unocal
.
1 posted on 07/15/2005 4:00:28 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: everyone

Bottom line: These big-business whores are holding out for more money from the tyrants of Beijing. Pigs, traitors, scum.


2 posted on 07/15/2005 4:16:27 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot

How else are you going to get all thoughs Wally World dollars back?


3 posted on 07/15/2005 4:25:13 PM PDT by El Laton Caliente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot

How else are you going to get all thoughs Wally World dollars back?


4 posted on 07/15/2005 4:25:42 PM PDT by El Laton Caliente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dane

You gotta figure China threatening to nuke us didn't help their takeover bid much.


5 posted on 07/15/2005 4:28:35 PM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Quality versus quanity. Tell you what, I'll take a cheap, quick and clean M&A any day over a long, dirty one, that may fail in the end.


6 posted on 07/15/2005 4:32:06 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Laton Caliente

I voted for Chevron a couple days ago on this thing.


7 posted on 07/15/2005 4:33:15 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

As a refinery worker (contract) I'm leaning toward Cheveron also. Formosa Chemical is bad enough to work for, the reds would be MUCH worse!


8 posted on 07/15/2005 5:54:59 PM PDT by El Laton Caliente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: festus

"China threatening to nuke us didn't help their takeover bid."

I dunno. I think some of these corporate pigs could care less. We shall see.


9 posted on 07/15/2005 8:58:53 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson