Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unocal board won't back CNOOC bid
The San Jose Mercury News ^ | 07/15/05 | George Avalos

Posted on 07/15/2005 6:04:00 PM PDT by RoyalsFan

Unocal board won't back CNOOC bid

Unocal Corp.'s directors refused to support a takeover of their company by CNOOC Ltd., the oil company whose parent is owned by the government of China.

Sources familiar with the bid said the Unocal directors didn't back the unsolicited takeover bid because the CNOOC bid did not raise the Chinese oil company's $18.5 billion cash offer.

San Ramon-based Chevron Corp. (CVX) has offered $16.3 billion in cash and stock to snap up Unocal. Chevron says its bid is superior to CNOOC's because the Chevron bid would close quickly, while CNOOC's proposal faces lengthy government delays. Federal regulators have already approved the Chevron offer.

The battle over Unocal has become entangled in geopolitics and an expanding appetite for crude oil among countries with fast-growing economies such as the United States, China and India.

More Unocal

A U.S. senator from North Dakota has decided to introduce legislation that would prohibit CNOOC, China's third-largest oil company, from buying Unocal. Sen. Byron Dorgan becomes the second federal lawmaker to propose a bill to block CNOOC's $18.5 billion takeover of Unocal. Bay Area Rep. Richard Pombo is separately seeking to amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to block the transaction.

More than half of Unocal's oil and gas reserves are in Asia.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: china; cnooc; oil; unocal

1 posted on 07/15/2005 6:04:01 PM PDT by RoyalsFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RoyalsFan
Unocal directors didn't back the unsolicited takeover bid because the CNOOC bid did not raise the Chinese oil company's $18.5 billion cash offer.

Not because it could impact American energy independence, of course.

2 posted on 07/15/2005 6:08:20 PM PDT by John Filson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Filson

Well the cash offer from China wasn't raised, and oh, China just threatened to nuke us!!!!


3 posted on 07/15/2005 6:10:32 PM PDT by NathanBookman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RoyalsFan
YEH!! :)
4 posted on 07/15/2005 6:18:26 PM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoyalsFan

Looks like Chevron's the winner, unless CNOOC gets more serious.


5 posted on 07/15/2005 7:20:04 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

HAHAHAHAHA!


6 posted on 07/15/2005 7:22:17 PM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

CNOOC is a thoroughly currupt organization..as are all the Chinese Govt companies. To let them own any US company is to invite criminals into our board rooms.(More Criminals).
To think the CNOOC is merely another commercial company is idiocy. Congress needs to tell the Chinese to take a hike..and a 27% or more tariff on all Chinese goods..make that 35% for the nuc comment..would generate billions to build some navy ships to ring China..


7 posted on 07/15/2005 8:32:08 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RoyalsFan; Admin Moderator

Duplicate.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1443913/posts


8 posted on 07/16/2005 2:28:36 AM PDT by endthematrix ("an ominous vacancy" fills this space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NathanBookman
Today in our beloved country we have an administration which seems eager to deal with communism in every coin known - from gold to wheat, from consulates to confidence, and even human freedom itself. --Barry Goldwater's acceptance speech, 1964
9 posted on 07/16/2005 11:40:24 PM PDT by John Filson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson