Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eastforker

Good for unocal for rejecting China's offer.


5 posted on 07/20/2005 10:05:49 AM PDT by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eastforker
Good for unocal for rejecting China's offer.

Yes. Especially since we can't count on the US govenment to intervene when national security is at stake.

Which brings to mind a point I believe needs to be discussed at length in the US congress. That being, should it even be legal for a [foreign] company that is basically a front for a [hostile] foreign government to aquire ANY US company. Period.

IMO, it should not be so. And the national legislature should be the body dealing with it. Of course, doing that would cause lots of yellow stained pants in the senate.

31 posted on 07/20/2005 10:42:00 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: eastforker

Good for unocal for rejecting China's offer.

CHINA is a Godless Commie Leadership of Fools, who still have Slave-Labor Factories!!!!!

Beware they will not take this lying down!


101 posted on 07/21/2005 3:53:02 PM PDT by LtKerst (Lt Kerst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson