Skip to comments.
Weeding Out the "Unfit" Unborn - New Threats From an Old Ideology
Zenit News Agency ^
| November 12, 2005
Posted on 11/12/2005 2:36:59 PM PST by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
1
posted on
11/12/2005 2:37:03 PM PST
by
NYer
To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
"From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person -- among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life." Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
2
posted on
11/12/2005 2:38:49 PM PST
by
NYer
(“Socialism is the religion people get when they lose their religion")
To: NYer
He said that traits such as empathy, sympathy and fair-mindedness could create more moral people. Let's murder the innocent, imperfect unborn so that we can have a more moral society. Riiiiight.
3
posted on
11/12/2005 2:41:55 PM PST
by
Siouxz
( Freepers are the best!!!)
To: NYer
Let's be careful. Remember, this unpleasant fellow believed in "genetic screening" too -
Regards, Ivan
4
posted on
11/12/2005 2:43:56 PM PST
by
MadIvan
(You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
To: Siouxz
5
posted on
11/12/2005 2:44:45 PM PST
by
brivette
To: All
The socialist medical system at work.
6
posted on
11/12/2005 2:45:01 PM PST
by
383rr
(Those who choose security over liberty deserve neither-)
To: MadIvan
Looking at the heading i knew that in the threads there would be a reference to the nazis. They sure were bad, but you'd think from FR that they were the only evil people in town. What about Stalin and Mao and Pol Pot, or Idi Amin and Saddam. Stalin and Mao killed far more people than the Nazis. Why are they not considered more evil?
7
posted on
11/12/2005 2:53:28 PM PST
by
seppel
To: seppel
If you've followed my posts, you know I'm an equal opportunity basher of Communists, Nazis and Islamists. I despise them all and believe all should be destroyed. However when it comes to the hell of "racial purity", the Nazis do have the edge. If it was class warfare, it would be the Communists. If it was mysogyny, it would be the Islamists.
Regards, Ivan
8
posted on
11/12/2005 2:55:54 PM PST
by
MadIvan
(You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
To: NYer
Himmler and Mengele are reborn into the fabric of western culture.
Wolf
9
posted on
11/12/2005 3:00:10 PM PST
by
RunningWolf
(tag line limbo)
To: MadIvan
Let us also not forget Professor Peter Singer, a so-called bio-ethicist, whose utterly poisonous ideas will come back to haunt us in very near future.
His ideas have ranged from the normalization of sex with pets to the termination of the recently born up to 28 days of age.
10
posted on
11/12/2005 3:02:14 PM PST
by
Noumenon
(Activist judges - out of touch, out of tune, but not out of reach.)
To: NYer
No different from the Nazis.
Except now they are being killed at a younger age, for less problematic diseases, and in greater numbers.
11
posted on
11/12/2005 3:07:26 PM PST
by
varyouga
(Reformed Kerry voter ( I know, I'm a frickin' idiot))
To: NYer
12
posted on
11/12/2005 3:12:35 PM PST
by
Bahbah
(Free Scooter; Tony Schaffer for the US Senate)
To: MadIvan
To: varyouga
I can't see the problem with deciding whether or not to give birth to a damaged child, except that if you decide knowingly to do so, you ought not to get insurance or welfare or otherwise be allowed to drain the public purse to support that choice.
If you choose to bear a damaged child and you can take care of it yourself, God bless you for it and more power to you and your family.
I really don't see the problem otherwise.
To: Siouxz
I think the ultimate goal, given academia's current idea of perfection, would be passive, effeminate males and dominant aggressive females. Ideally both male and female would be bisexual and not prejudiced against other species. That would be paradise to today's progressives.
15
posted on
11/12/2005 3:23:19 PM PST
by
isrul
To: Pontiac
Bump for later consideration.
16
posted on
11/12/2005 3:23:32 PM PST
by
Pontiac
(Ignorance of the law is no excuse, ignorance of your rights can be fatal.)
To: KateatRFM
I can understand major disorders where a child has no possibility of surviving birth or a child that will be born without a brain. Something on that level may be OK.
But the article lists many "problems" that are livable or treatable most of the time. This slippery slope will lead us to screen for sex, personalities, intelligence and physical structure.
17
posted on
11/12/2005 3:25:44 PM PST
by
varyouga
(Reformed Kerry voter ( I know, I'm a frickin' idiot))
To: KateatRFM
I can't see the problem with deciding whether or not to give birth to a damaged child, except that if you decide knowingly to do so, you ought not to get insurance or welfare or otherwise be allowed to drain the public purse to support that choice. That kind of clear thinking isn't allowed on FreeRepublic after the invasion of the ShaivoNuts. Get ready to be blasted.
18
posted on
11/12/2005 3:32:08 PM PST
by
bukkdems
("My aunt was very frugal" - Benon Savon)
To: KateatRFM; Bahbah; Liz; Calpernia; little jeremiah; NYer; Alouette
Kate, you seem to peg yourself in the 'fiscal conservative' but 'socially progressive' categories. May I point out the logical conclusion of your premises?
I note you acknowledge the procreation as a child.
You've framed keeping 'something damaged' alive as a fiscal responsibility rather than a moral imperative.
You've just subjected all humanity to a Kelo ruling, fiscal eminent domain.
Do you realize this?
19
posted on
11/12/2005 3:35:40 PM PST
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: Noumenon
20
posted on
11/12/2005 3:40:53 PM PST
by
NYer
(“Socialism is the religion people get when they lose their religion")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson