Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beaversmom

That part is pretty hard to understand. Moral considerations aside, the sheer expense of abortion vs. contraception would seem to be a deterrent.


20 posted on 01/15/2006 5:24:11 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: linda_22003

For the middle and upper-middle class it doesn't matter - most major medical insurers will pay for it.

I was quite disgusted, but not at all surprised, to learn that my own insurance would pay 100% for an elective abortion - yet a common hormonal contraceptive costs me $20/month copay plus about $250/year in premiums towards prescription drug coverage (to be fair, the premiums cover both me and my husband).

Of course this doesn't work for high schoolers or college students still on their parents' insurance, because then Mom and Dad would see the insurance statements. Abortion is covered by insurers for those women who should know better - women who are educated, who work, and who ought to know that if they're having sex at a time in life where children are not wanted, they need to use contraception.


49 posted on 01/15/2006 5:53:20 AM PST by Rubber_Duckie_27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: linda_22003
****That part is pretty hard to understand. Moral considerations aside, the sheer expense of abortion vs. contraception would seem to be a deterrent.****

Don't forget, there's no expense if the gubmint (aka us) is paying for it. And there's not just Medicaid or 'Welfare'. All those 'free clinics' get gubmint funding (grants, etc) too.

68 posted on 01/15/2006 6:38:54 AM PST by Condor51 (The above comment is time sensitive - don't BUG ME an hour from now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson