Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions
News Max ^ | April 13, 2006 | Dave Eberhart,

Posted on 04/13/2006 6:30:38 AM PDT by esryle

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The silent submarine forces of the United States, Israel and Iran are all ramping up for a hot war, adding yet more tension to an already volatile Middle East -- made all the more uneasy by Iran's relentless march to become a nuclear power.

Leading off the always lurking and deadly wolfpacks is Israel's fleet of Dolphin-class submarines, each carrying U.S.-supplied Harpoon cruise missiles -- armed with nuclear warheads.

The Israel submarines can remain at sea for a month and are equipped with six torpedo tubes appropriate for conventional torpedoes. The tubes can also be used to launch the nuclear-tipped cruise missiles -- missiles that could reach some of the targeted sites in Iran critical to its nuclear development.

Starting with just three of these Dolphin-class undersea intruders, the Israeli inventory quickly went to a fourth and a fifth. And there are reportedly at least a half-dozen in the pipeline -- two being built by the People's Republic of China.

Although most particulars of Iran's military assets -- both personnel and hardware -- is closely held by that country, military experts opine that Iran has up to six Russian-built SSK or SSI Kilo-class diesel submarines prowling the Gulf.

Most recently, Iran's armed forces added to this fleet by deploying a new locally built submarine in Persian Gulf waters, state television reported.

The vessel was christened the Nahang, meaning whale. Built by the Iranian Defense Ministry, the sub has the capability "to carry multipurpose weapons for different missions," according to Iranian Rear Adm. Sajjad Kouchaki.

"The submarine is fully adapted to the Persian Gulf," he said, adding that the Iranian navy is pursuing a policy of deterrence in the strategic waters.

Perhaps even more significant, is the recent Iranian deployment of a super high-speed torpedo. The new torpedo was reportedly successfully tested last month during war games that Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards held in the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea.

State news sources touted the successfully test-firing of the new torpedo, called the "Hoot." The development ups the profile of Iran's power in the Gulf, where the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet is based to, among other things, safeguard the flow of oil.

Gen. Ali Fadavi, deputy head of the Revolutionary Guards' navy, said that the torpedo, speeding at 223 miles per hour, was too fast to elude.

"It has a very powerful warhead designed to hit big submarines," Fadavi told state television.

Meanwhile, the Bush administration recently announced plans to add conventional ballistic missiles to the armory of its nuclear Trident submarines –- adding yet another potential arm to any military option considered against Iran, if diplomacy and/or sanctions fail to persuade that country to give up its nuclear designs.

According to Defense Daily last January, four ultra-stealthy Ohio-class Strategic Nuclear Submarines, or SSBNs, were having their 24 Trident II D-5 nuclear ballistic missiles removed and replaced with up to 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cruisemissiles; iran; irannukes; silentservice; submarines; usn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
TheSubReport.com
1 posted on 04/13/2006 6:30:39 AM PDT by esryle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: esryle
If there is an American or Israeli strike against Iran, it would probably involve submarine-based operations for the reason missles can take out targets faster and better than aircraft without putting pilots in harms' way.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

2 posted on 04/13/2006 6:34:54 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esryle

I hope our submarines make alot of noise soon. This thing with Iran has been a festering sore since the Carter Administration. It is time to clean up Jimmy's mess.


3 posted on 04/13/2006 6:35:03 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esryle

In the event of war, Iran's "silent submarine force" will be destroyed in less than 24 hours.


4 posted on 04/13/2006 6:35:46 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esryle
Certainly I am not an expert, but it seems to me that the advantage the U.S. military has, in all branches, over other countries, is high technology, coupled with well-trained crews and honed by extensive experience.

While it may be possible that Iran has some decent technology, I wonder how capable their crews are, and how adequately they can be deployed.

Has Iran ever been in a submarine battle? Do they have any tactical capability?
5 posted on 04/13/2006 6:39:23 AM PDT by CertainInalienableRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esryle
Leading off the always lurking and deadly wolfpacks is Israel's fleet of Dolphin-class submarines, each carrying U.S.-supplied Harpoon cruise missiles -- armed with nuclear warheads.

Iran -- we're talking to you...

6 posted on 04/13/2006 6:39:35 AM PDT by GOPJ (Tolerance of evil is not virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

You don't know much about D/E boats I take it. They are harder to detect than a nuc boat unless they are snorkling. They are pefectly suited to the littoral waters of the Persian gulf and especially the Suez canal.

I have the utmost faith in our ASW forces but the Kilo should not be underestimated, in it's environment it could prove to be a very nasty foe.


7 posted on 04/13/2006 6:40:23 AM PDT by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

Actually the submariners hope they dont make alot of noise...


8 posted on 04/13/2006 6:45:12 AM PDT by When do we get liberated? ((God save us from the whining, useless, irrelevent left...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CertainInalienableRights

I wouldnt put a lot of stock in the Iranian Navy's submarine program. The Iranian "whale" submarine looks to me like it has the same size and seakeeping ability of the WWII German Seehund boats.

They have a few export Kilo boats, and a little bit of advanced technology to go with it, but Kilo's are a known commodity to the US Navy. I imagine the Israeli navy knows a thing or two about them too.



9 posted on 04/13/2006 6:45:44 AM PDT by judicial meanz (Progressive liberals and Stalinists; tell me exactly where they are different in their beliefs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

I hope everyone does remember who started this mess. Thank you Jimmy Carter.
susie


10 posted on 04/13/2006 6:46:29 AM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I think you're giving them about 23 hours I wouldn't.


11 posted on 04/13/2006 6:48:44 AM PDT by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rattrap
You don't know much about D/E boats I take it. They are harder to detect than a nuc boat unless they are snorkling. They are pefectly suited to the littoral waters of the Persian gulf and especially the Suez canal.

I agree that these boats can be deadly. If you don't think a diesel / electric boat is quiet when running submerged, take a minute and raise the hood of your car and listen to the battery.

12 posted on 04/13/2006 6:48:56 AM PDT by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rattrap
You don't know much about D/E boats I take it. They are harder to detect than a nuc boat unless they are snorkling.

I understand that when running electric, they are dead silent. If they have been operating in these waters for some time now, do you think that we have 'signatures' on each of their boats and have at least a reasonable idea of where they are? I would hope so.

13 posted on 04/13/2006 6:50:47 AM PDT by ExpatCanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB; rattrap
I won't dispute the fact that D/E boats are very quiet.

But what we saw in Iraq (both times) is that some military folks don't make proper use of what they have.

If the Iranian navy used active sonar when looking for our subs, I wouldn't be surprised. There is a lot of bone-headed things they could do. We might say: "They'd never do anything that stupid!"

Wait and see. Iraq made many, many embarassing mistakes.

14 posted on 04/13/2006 6:53:35 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rattrap

Can a submarine travel the length of the Suez Canal and not be detected?


15 posted on 04/13/2006 6:59:00 AM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ops33

Some canals are more difficult to traverse without being spotted.

16 posted on 04/13/2006 7:03:24 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: esryle
I've never heard of a nuke harpoon, the 'poon is an anti-ship missile, I do not know it's land attack capabilities, but its range is ~100 miles, I doubt that range is far enough inside Iran to make a difference when talking about the uranium refining and other bomb making sites
17 posted on 04/13/2006 7:07:25 AM PDT by thinkthenpost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Yeah training of the submariners is the top factor.

The US navy performs exercises with D/E boats from European and South American countries, even a Kilo from Poland. We can detect them but if the guys operating know what they are doing they are the only subs that can actually go dead quiet. A nuc boat always puts out a 50 or 60 cycle hum depending on it's country of origin.


18 posted on 04/13/2006 7:07:50 AM PDT by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

Photo didn't come through.


19 posted on 04/13/2006 7:09:32 AM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ops33

Depends on the guys operating and what the ASW forces are using for detection. Running at 3(ish) knots on batteries a D/E boat is pretty much completely silent. No sub can hide from a Magnetic anomaly detector but the detection range on those is fairly small. Active sonar (pings) can also find anything but it gives away the position of anything using it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_anomaly_detector


20 posted on 04/13/2006 7:11:26 AM PDT by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson