Then you're just wrong, on a purely factual; basis.
It has nothing to do with her military service.
Voluntary military service is usually a pretty strong indication of selflessness.
My definition of a "single-mother" is a woman who has children out of wedlock and has no intention of giving their bastard a father.
Then your definition is highly idiosyncratic.
A single mother is, obviously, a mother who is single.
I.e. a woman who is raising children and is not married.
The vast majority of single mothers really do wish that there were a responsible husband and father in the family.
It is a rare single mother indeed who will turn down a serious marriage proposal from a normal man.
Aside from the fact that this "single mother" is divorced and joined the military to get off of Public assistance.....
Let's say she did have a child out of wedlock. Would she have been better off aborting her "bastard child"? What is to say the man had no intention of giving her child a father?
"Do you really believe that people who volunteer for military service are selfish people?"
She is selfish because she is a "single mother". It has nothing to do with her military service. My definition of a "single-mother" is a woman who has children out of wedlock and has no intention of giving their bastard a father.
Then you must admit that your definition does not apply in this case, and that she is not a "single mother." The article clearly states that she was married.
We do not know the circumstances of her divorce, and considering that she is serving our nation (and will go back when asked) I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt.
Before jumping to conclusions, you might actually pause and check that the facts are on your side. In this case, they are not.
You'd prefer she had an abortion?
And don't give me the pat answer that she is a trollop for having had sex out of wedlock. The deed was done. A child was born.
Perhaps she should have dumped it in a garbage bin.