Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mini-Mag Orion Will Reach for the Stars
The Future of Things ^ | September 20, 2007 | Sarah Gingichashvili

Posted on 09/20/2007 8:42:20 PM PDT by anymouse

Andrews Space & Technology (AS&T) introduced an innovative propulsion system that could significantly shorten round trips from Earth to Mars (from two years to only six months!) and enable our spaceships to reach Jupiter after one year of space traveling. The system, which may dramatically affect interplanetary space travel is called the Miniature Magnetic Orion (Mini-Mag Orion for short), and is an optimization of the 1958 Orion interplanetary propulsion concept.

The original Orion project was headed by Ted Taylor from General Atomics, who together with the famous physicist Freeman Dyson suggested ejecting nuclear explosives behind a spacecraft in order to propel it forward. The Mini-Mag system uses a magnetic field in order to trigger an explosion of compressed material in the form of small pellets weighing several grams. This explosion, although being significantly weaker than a nuclear explosion, creates plasma that is directed through a magnetic nozzle to generate vehicle thrust. The proposed technology enables the production of thrust at high efficiency, hopefully allowing drastic reduction of interplanetary travel time. According to calculations performed by AS&T, this type of propulsion system can produce the same thrust as the Space Shuttle Main Engine, with 50 times more efficiency.

Due to the magnetic compression thrust technology, spacecrafts could be smaller and less heavy. The spacecraft itself will only have to carry a relatively small amount of fissionable material as fuel and will be able to reach speeds of approximately 10% of the speed of light. Dr. Dana Andrews, AS&T Chief Technology Officer and Mini-Mag Orion inventor, and Roger Lenard from the Sandia National Laboratories, have published a paper describing their research into the Mini-Mag Orion concept in the Acta Astronautica – Journal of the International Academy of Astronautics.

In the framework of their research into the subject, the scientists conducted an experiment that tested the process of compressing a simulated fissile material in a magnetic field. "The experiment validated the physical process behind the MMO concept, substantiating MMO's potential of enabling shorter interplanetary trip time for near-term space travel" - said AS&T Principal Investigator Ralph Ewig. "We are still far from constructing an actual vehicle, but the present research will chart the course for human missions to other planets in the near future. The Mini-Mag Orion system shows significant promise, and the successful completion of our experiment demonstrated the physics and validated our approach for a near-term, in-space, advanced propulsion system," said Dr. Andrews.

The MMO study has been funded by the NASA Phase II Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) and was conducted in cooperation with Sandia National Laboratories and the University of Washington’s Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Technical; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: mars; nuclear; propulsion; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

I knew Dr. Dana Andrews about 13 years ago. He is one smart engineer. I hear good things about his son too.

1 posted on 09/20/2007 8:42:22 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis; Shuttle Shucker; timer

space ping


2 posted on 09/20/2007 8:43:18 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse


"I shall call it...Mini-Mag!"

3 posted on 09/20/2007 8:47:47 PM PDT by Reaganesque (Romney for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Mini mag spaceship reaches for the stars?


4 posted on 09/20/2007 8:50:04 PM PDT by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

0.1C, holy moly! Alpha Centauri in 43 years!


5 posted on 09/20/2007 8:50:18 PM PDT by poindexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poindexter
0.1C, holy moly! Alpha Centauri in 43 years!

Don't forget he acceleration and braking phases. Most high efficiency propulsion has really weak thrust.

6 posted on 09/20/2007 8:53:30 PM PDT by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

Here they’re talking about levels of thrust comparable to an SSME. From the description, I wouldn’t be surprised if the thrust level vs. efficiency can be adjusted much like a VASIMR engine — high thrust, low effiency where you need thrust and low thrust, high efficiency during the cruise phase.


7 posted on 09/20/2007 8:56:41 PM PDT by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: poindexter

“0.1C, holy moly! Alpha Centauri in 43 years!”

A mere 42.78 years to the pilot!


8 posted on 09/20/2007 9:00:36 PM PDT by beavus (People are rational in the mundane. Irrationality is left for what matters most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Free umbelicals. Thrusters to station keeping. Ahead 1/4 impulse.
9 posted on 09/20/2007 9:01:42 PM PDT by BigCinBigD (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

will be able to reach speeds of approximately 10% of the speed of light———————————————————————67,061,662.92 mph / Obviously, this dude is smoking some good stuff !


10 posted on 09/20/2007 9:19:02 PM PDT by CheezyChesster (Failed Diplomacy : IT'S ABOUT THE MONEY STUPID !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

Hang on to those suckers tight when you turn them on! Mine went through the durn ceiling on me.


11 posted on 09/20/2007 10:37:15 PM PDT by Dumpster Baby ("Hope somebody finds me before the rats do .....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anymouse; Bender2

Well, it’s no torch ship :-) but it’s a nice start to practicable interplanetary flight.


12 posted on 09/20/2007 10:40:50 PM PDT by TrueKnightGalahad (Your feeble skills are no match for the power of the Viking Kitties!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Hmmm, interesting. Of course we’ve long had ion propulsion with very low/slow but steady forces involved. I remember an earth to moon mission once that used it to s-l-o-w-l-y inch its way out of the terran gravity well and into the lunar gravity well. Its developer said that if oxygen and food had been available for weeks, even months, the apollo spacecraft could have gotten there on 1/4 the fuel.

Be as it may, this is still a theoretical concept, and finding FUNDING for it will be the BIG CLIMB out of the earth’s gravity well for it. Congress? Forget it. They’ve run us $9T in debt, no hope there.

Speaking of space propulsion concepts, have you heard of the magnetic sail? There you have a 1 km diameter ring of superconductor, about a pencil width in size. It sets up a dipole field and depending on orientation to the solar wind it either drops inward toward venus/mercury or outward to mars and beyond.

The dipole field also keeps out solar wind charged particles. A spider web of cables tie from the ring to a central cabin and merely by offsetting the cabin from the center you change the orientation.

Once in orbit then there is no fuel required, the solar WIND is your “fuel”, just as with the sailing ships of old. Anyway, I thought it was a neat idea(expressed in the science fact section of ANALOG sci-fi mag).


13 posted on 09/21/2007 12:14:21 AM PDT by timer (n/0=n=nx0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

ping for future.

(It would be great if these space threads got hundreds of comments).

14 posted on 09/21/2007 2:15:16 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TrueKnightGalahad
Morning True...

Moving a little slow here at the junction, but I agree.

No torch, but... give that man a cigar and pass me a wakeup beer!

15 posted on 09/21/2007 4:41:29 AM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TrueKnightGalahad; NicknamedBob
Well, it’s no torch ship :-)

LOL!

16 posted on 09/21/2007 8:07:35 AM PDT by sionnsar (trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar; anymouse; RightWhale; timer
I hate to be the wet blanket here, but isn't someone going to object to spewing ...

"... a relatively small amount of fissionable material as fuel ..."

... out in the navigable interplanetary spacelanes?

Have we forgotten about the announcement a few days ago about a much more efficient laser propulsion system? At least that couldn't be accused of polluting with anything more than light, and even that can be ameliorated by adjusting the pointing directions.

I'm inclined to sit back from the edge of my seat on this idea.

17 posted on 09/21/2007 3:12:21 PM PDT by NicknamedBob ("The enemy of my enemy is an anemone." -- Nemo, and Nemo's father.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

bump for later reading


18 posted on 09/21/2007 3:23:19 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

The laser motor is very small and scaling up will not be easy.


19 posted on 09/21/2007 4:04:53 PM PDT by RightWhale (Snow above 2000', oil above 82, 83, 84, 81: unexplained)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
this type of propulsion system can produce the same thrust as the Space Shuttle Main Engine, with 50 times more efficiency.

Doesn't the STS ME produce a couple million pounds of thrust? Sounds pretty good.

It uses fissile material, but the explosion is non nuclear?

Gonna need some help with that one.

20 posted on 09/21/2007 4:33:24 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson