Posted on 12/24/2007 9:25:51 AM PST by Reagan is King
While the headlines concentrate on peace breaking out in Iraq, that's but part of a worldwide trend for the last few years. Violence has also diminished, or disappeared completely, in places like Nepal, Chechnya. Congo, Indonesia and Burundi. This continues a trend that began when the Cold War ended, and the Soviet Union no longer subsidized terrorist and rebel groups everywhere. The current wars are basically uprisings against police states or feudal societies, which are seen as out-of-step with the modern world. Many are led by radicals preaching failed dogmas (Islamic conservatism, Maoism), that still resonate among people who don't know about the dismal track records of these movements.
(Excerpt) Read more at strategypage.com ...
Thanks for the post...
bump for later read.
If true, thank you Chaney & Rumsfeld.
true
WAR ON TERROR
International terrorism has created a international backlash and a war unlike any other. The only terrorist victories are in the media. On the ground, the terrorists are losing ground everywhere. Their last refuges are chaotic, or cynical, places like Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Somalia, Gaza, the Sahel, a few of the Philippine islands, and tribal regions of Pakistan. They are being chased out of Iraq, Somalia and the Philippines, while Pakistan is getting increasingly tough with terrorists and pro-terrorist groups. Iran continues to support terrorism in the face of much local disapproval. Syria and Lebanon are in chaos because of Iranian subsidized factions. Gaza went the same way. Islamic radicals are a traditional reaction to tyranny in their region, and inability of local despots to rule effectively. Economic and diplomatic ties with the West are interpreted as support, leading to attacks on Western targets that created a devastating counterattack. The result of this in the Moslem world has been dramatic, finally forcing leaders and people to confront their self-inflicted problems. Al Qaeda is as self-destructive as its many predecessors. For example, an al Qaeda suicide bomber recently blew himself up in a crowded mosque, killing 48 worshippers. This, naturally, turns Moslems against al Qaeda in a big way. But the terrorists justify such dumb attacks because their doctrine holds that Moslems who don't agree with them, are not really Moslems. You can imagine how well that goes over with most Moslems. You can, but al Qaeda can't, and that is what guarantees their demise.
ping for later
The only terrorist victories are in the media.
The article also makes an important point without dwelling on it:
...some historians like to point out, for example, that the medieval Crusades were a series of wars fought in response to Islamic violence against Christians, not the opening act of aggression against Islam that continue to the present.
This needs to be emphasized to the bleeding-heart, liberal traitors; Western Civilization, once characterized as Christendom, defends itself against radical Islamic attacks.
"Right" remains on the side of Western Civilization and is only subject to self-doubt by traitors.
Not that anyone will give them the least bit of credit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.