To: shield
It’s not about us attacking Iran; it’s about us tracking down the physical location of the sender of attack signals to distributed terror cells.
When the 2nd internet cable was cut, you can find my post here on FR where I stated that more cuts would follow as net traffic was narrowed down further and further to limit the potential areas where a command originated.
Now 5 cables have been cut.
Had this been a prelude to an actual attack on Iran, the cables would have been cut less than an hour before missiles were in the air.
7 posted on
02/09/2008 9:00:23 PM PST by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
I think he said it was either or
12 posted on
02/09/2008 9:03:45 PM PST by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: Southack
Your comments make sense. It will be interesting when it is revealed exactly what is going on here. You may be right on target.
20 posted on
02/09/2008 9:15:49 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(That's right McStain, you'll get my vote when you peel it from my cold dead fingers.)
To: Southack
Now 5 cables have been cut. Had this been a prelude to an actual attack on Iran, the cables would have been cut less than an hour before missiles were in the air. Maybe it's the frog in the pot - cut them one at a time and they don't over-react.
28 posted on
02/09/2008 9:50:00 PM PST by
GOPJ
(Take your ball - go home - sit this one out? Fifty years of liberal Supreme Court decisions? NO WAY.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson