Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Army begins test-firing mortars from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
GeoStrategies Direct ^ | 4/16/2010 | GeoStrategies Direct

Posted on 04/16/2010 8:15:10 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

The U.S. Army, in what could signal a direction in combat missions, has launched mortars from unmanned aerial vehicles. The U.S. Army and General Dynamics (GD) have conducted tests of a so-called Air-Dropped Guided Mortar from UAVs in what could transform reconnaissance aircraft into attack platforms. The tests were meant to determine whether mortars fired from tactical UAV platforms could strike moving ground targets.

In a test in early 2010, General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems was said to have struck a stationary ground target with an 81mm UAV-launched mortar. The mortar, launched at the army's test grounds at Ft. Sill, Okla., was equipped with a guidance kit and fuse meant to provide precision strike capability.

"The ADM was released from a TUAV using the company's newly developed 'Smart Rack' carriage and release system that enables weaponization of any TUAV platform," GD said.

GD did not identify the air platform, merely calling it a tactical class UAV. Tests with the 81 mm guided mortar were said to have begun in 2008.

"Designed to meet the needs of the U.S. Army, Marine Corps and Special Forces for a rapid target response capability, the ADM uses existing mortar inventory to provide a low-cost, lightweight weapon system with proven energetics," GD said.

Executives said the so-called Roll Controlled Fixed Canard guidance kit, with flight-control and GPS-based guidance and navigational system, added precision strike capability to existing mortars.

They said the nose-mounted guidance kit would replace existing mortar fuzes and was demonstrated on multiple mortar calibers in both air-drop and tube-launch applications.

Middle East countries have been closely following combat UAV demonstrations in the United States. Israel has developed a UAV strike capability, with Turkey seeking to buy such a platform from the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at geostrategy-direct.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; mortars; ordinance; uav; usarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 04/16/2010 8:15:10 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

That’s cool. Here I am, fixing medical equipment for a living. What a sucker. i need a job where I get to blow things up.


2 posted on 04/16/2010 8:19:21 PM PDT by edpc (Those Lefties just ain't right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Wow. If this is really accurate it sounds like a much cheaper alternative to a Hellfire.


3 posted on 04/16/2010 8:22:03 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


81mm air dropped mortar
4 posted on 04/16/2010 8:23:55 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Is it a mortar? A guided munition? It is a bit odd to call it a mortar.

Couldn’t use the link as it required signing in. Anyone with some knowledge of this mind explaining it to a layman?


5 posted on 04/16/2010 8:24:59 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
A flying mortar section could make attending an inspiring rant by your favorite Taliwhacker chieftain a very dicey activity.
6 posted on 04/16/2010 8:27:03 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Sooner or later, someone has to take the ground.


7 posted on 04/16/2010 8:27:49 PM PDT by Funee Kat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
Flying, remotely piloted M-106 !

Sounds like a winner for our guys on the ground!

8 posted on 04/16/2010 8:34:35 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
Mortar? What distinguishes a mortar from a bomb?

How could you have an indirect fire munition on board an aircraft where it has line of sight to the target at all times?

9 posted on 04/16/2010 8:35:11 PM PDT by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Don’t they normally call them bombs when dropped from a plane?


10 posted on 04/16/2010 8:37:13 PM PDT by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic
I have the same questions.

It LOOKS like a standard mortar round with a big guidance package attached, turning it into a "smart" mortar round. It appears to be a gravity rather than a powered device, but is tail-fin steerable.

This is definitely the trend: cheaply (by defense standards)turning dumb bombs into smart ones by using GPS, Laser, and thermal guidance devices. This is now done with many artillery rounds, including ground-based mortars. Amazing accuracy.

As a relic from the era of dumb bombs, but hopefully intelligent pilots, I can't wait to find out more. Perhaps I can be recycled as an UAV pilot, although my grandchildren beat the hell out of me in video games.

11 posted on 04/16/2010 8:37:17 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Obama. He'll bring back States' Rights. In the meantime, this ain't gonna be pretty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Funee Kat
"Sooner or later, someone has to take the ground."

...but it is much easier when the enemy is spread over it in a thin, red film...

12 posted on 04/16/2010 8:38:00 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

13 posted on 04/16/2010 8:39:33 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (No sane man loves war. But all decent men realize there can be no peace with tyrants or terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

It’s worth it. My college/frat buddy works for Raytheon tells me he’s in jock heaven and wouldn’t trade places for anything.


14 posted on 04/16/2010 8:39:46 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

In the old days, weren’t these things called “bombs”?


15 posted on 04/16/2010 8:40:04 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kent1957

Well, I’m guessing they’re firing them rather than dropping them. The motivation is probably that a mortar round is a lot cheaper than a missile. But like a missile, the mortar can be fired from a distance, and if it is guided, it is accurate like a missile.


16 posted on 04/16/2010 8:41:45 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic
MOre info: immediately after launch from its canister, the munition deploys four tail fins for stability. At apogee, (the point of maximum altitude) PGMM (Precision Guided Mortar Munition) deploys four wings that glide and steer the munition to its target.
The munition provides a man-in-the-loop discrimination option, in which the round guides toward laser-designated targets when specific target selection is critical. The PGMM also utilizes an imaging infrared guidance capability for autonomous navigation to the target, thus providing a "fire-and-forget" precision guided weapon.

Toto, we're not in Korea anymore.

17 posted on 04/16/2010 8:42:42 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Obama. He'll bring back States' Rights. In the meantime, this ain't gonna be pretty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: edpc

A mechanical engineer colleague left our optical communications startup to work for somebody in NH building very high firing rate machine guns. He’s having a blast.

I’m in software — nothing even moves. Let me tell you, that’s really rough for a mechanical engineer!


18 posted on 04/16/2010 8:43:16 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic
The simple answer is it's cheaper to slap a guidance system on an existing munition that is available in plentiful quantities than it is to design and build a purpose built munition.

We did it to dumb bombs with JDAM kits, and now we're doing it to mortar rounds in this iteration. It's still a mortar round, it's just not being deployed the standard way nor left to the mercy of simple ballistics.

19 posted on 04/16/2010 8:44:26 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
"...to provide a low-cost, lightweight weapon system with proven energetics,"...

proven energetics = big can of whoopass
If it works, great! If it's cheaper than other weapon systems for the role, even better. If it kills our enemies and saves our guys, it's a winner.

20 posted on 04/16/2010 8:51:11 PM PDT by 50cal Smokepole (Effective gun control involves effective recoil management)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson