Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(CT) WFSB-3 Exclusive Report of Bridgeport Poll Issues
WFSB Channel 3 ^ | 04 November 10 | Dennis House

Posted on 11/05/2010 6:53:50 AM PDT by LoneGOPinCT

This video from WFSB 3 showing a disagreement between a poll watcher and a poll worker. The worker can be seen mixing official and unofficial ballots. The watcher advises them repeatedly that they cannot do that. (Of course) the police officer comes over and escorts the poll watcher away.

In the interview, Vernon Mayor Jason McCoy tells viewers that he went to the Bridgeport polls to observe after receiving information of potential issues there. Not the least of which was a bunch of ballots that were mailed to a vacant lot in the city.

ID's were not checked. Ballots were stuck together. He did say that some honest voters brought back 3 or 4 extras. Ballots were not secured.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS:
The Mayor of Bridgeport also used the Reverse 911 system to advise voters that they could come back and vote until 10:00.

Move over Florida. There's a new laughing stock in town.

1 posted on 11/05/2010 6:53:53 AM PDT by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

Shoot, link didn’t show up. Here’s the link:
http://www.wfsb.com/local-video/index.html?grabnetworks_video_id=4405211


2 posted on 11/05/2010 6:55:43 AM PDT by LoneGOPinCT (I'd still rather hunt with Cheney than ride with Kennedy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT
STRAIGHT-UP in your face VOTER FRAUD and yet nothing comes of it.

We need to make a ****ing fist.

3 posted on 11/05/2010 6:56:18 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Karl Rove: The Republican Jimmy Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

breaking news!!!

Bag of Uncounted Ballots Found in CT [Bridgeport!!]

http://nation.foxnews.com/2010-midterms/2010/11/05/bag-uncounted-ballots-found-ct


4 posted on 11/05/2010 7:04:03 AM PDT by Bulwinkle (Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

The level of corruption in Connecticut politics is high, primarily in places like Bridgeport, Norwalk and Stamford (all in otherwise mostly Republican Fairfield County), and in New Haven and Hartford. These are places where much of the population are on the dole or work for government. The state will soon be like California.


5 posted on 11/05/2010 7:11:36 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Persae Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

Was the Bridgeport poll worker coached into screaming “I quit” when questioned by a poll watcher?


6 posted on 11/05/2010 7:11:50 AM PDT by BillyBonebrake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

Reaffirms Hugh Hewitt’s dictum “If It Ain’t Close They Can’t Cheat”.


7 posted on 11/05/2010 7:13:34 AM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT
I particularly note the allegation that voters were receiving multiple ballots and not being required to provide photo identification, as required by Connecticut law.

No votes from any such polling place should be counted: rather, everyone checked off as having voted should be contacted, and brought in to recast his or her vote (after providing proper photo identification) at a securely guarded location with high level poll watchers and election lawyers from all of the parties on the ballot.

8 posted on 11/05/2010 7:24:01 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Persae Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT
I really can't begin to understand how this is tolerated.

Yeah, I live in Floriduh and every county does it slightly differently.

When I vote, I must vote at the precinct in which I'm registered. My name is on a roster, I have to show ID and sign the roster and the signature is checked against my legal ID. The ballots are padded and each ballot stub is numbered and the number of the ballot assigned to me recorded on the roster. The actual ballot is not numbered so that the actual vote can not be traced to a specific voter. But every ballot , voted and leftovers, is accounted for and maintained in a chain of custody. We don't "find" boxes or bags of ballots days later.

Why this or something similar isn't the National standard is beyond me. The fact that it is not proves to me that the mechanism for cheating is blatantly intentional.

9 posted on 11/05/2010 7:37:51 AM PDT by sjmjax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
I particularly note the allegation that voters were receiving multiple ballots and not being required to provide photo identification, as required by Connecticut law. No votes from any such polling place should be counted: rather, everyone checked off as having voted should be contacted, and brought in to recast his or her vote (after providing proper photo identification) at a securely guarded location with high level poll watchers and election lawyers from all of the parties on the ballot."

But...but...but...that would be voter intimi-DA-tion.

10 posted on 11/05/2010 7:38:26 AM PDT by LoneGOPinCT (I'd still rather hunt with Cheney than ride with Kennedy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sjmjax
When I vote, I must vote at the precinct in which I'm registered. My name is on a roster, I have to show ID and sign the roster and the signature is checked against my legal ID. The ballots are padded and each ballot stub is numbered and the number of the ballot assigned to me recorded on the roster. The actual ballot is not numbered so that the actual vote can not be traced to a specific voter. But every ballot , voted and leftovers, is accounted for and maintained in a chain of custody. We don't "find" boxes or bags of ballots days later.

Why this or something similar isn't the National standard is beyond me. The fact that it is not proves to me that the mechanism for cheating is blatantly intentional.

That is how we vote in the suburbs and rural areas. But stringent ID checking is always deemed "intimidation" in the urban areas. Ignore the fact that the poll workers are also city residents, probably of the same party affiliation.

11 posted on 11/05/2010 7:47:32 AM PDT by LoneGOPinCT (I'd still rather hunt with Cheney than ride with Kennedy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT
the police officer comes over and escorts the poll watcher away.

Nothing to see here folks. Nothing to see here.

12 posted on 11/05/2010 8:11:01 AM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sjmjax

Of course the cheating is intentional;the Democrat party steals elective offices every election ,and for some odd reason the Republican party organization won’t do a thing about it.


13 posted on 11/05/2010 8:12:05 AM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sjmjax

Of course the cheating is intentional;the Democrat party steals elective offices every election ,and for some odd reason the Republican party organization won’t do a thing about it.


14 posted on 11/05/2010 8:12:22 AM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

It matters not that it was done in the light of day (and a TV camera or two), there will be no penalty to speak of and the ballots will all be counted. There is no downside and folks will likely get their secret rewards.


15 posted on 11/05/2010 8:25:53 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

I used to work as in a voting precinct for election day many years ago in Fairfax County, VA as both a regular worker and as a chief/assistant chief.

Whenever we allowed someone to vote a provisional ballot, that ballot was a special form which was a different color and was sealed in a same color envelope marked “PROVISIONAL BALLOT”. It was placed in a lock box and not opened or counted with our results.

Voters who used provisional ballots were informed that their ballot was not guaranteed to be counted and would have to be reviewed by county election officials as to their validity. Even then it would only be counted if the margin of victory was slim enough that it would make a difference.

Mixing provisional ballots with regular ballots is a disgrace to the election system and potentially disenfranchises legitimate voters.

Deliberately doing this should carry the highest legal penalties.


16 posted on 11/05/2010 9:08:07 AM PDT by Crolis ("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it." -GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson