Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AtlasStalled

Gotta have those young, hot lookin’ babes, even if it costs $33 a minute. A fool and his money are soon parted.


3 posted on 03/07/2012 8:56:49 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blueunicorn6

She will be carefully prosecuted in order that her client list never is made public. She may even have been arrested because she was using the list for some type of leverage. Watergate had a similar origin.


5 posted on 03/07/2012 9:07:53 AM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: blueunicorn6

Well, that’s still usually cheaper than dating those high maintenance babes and definitely cheaper than giving one a house and stipend. They’re usually damaged and jaded from having men do anything to sleep with them. These girls are less than 1%, even in NYC.

Guys that “date” these 1% girls will give them $500 dinners with $500-2000 champagne, trips on private jets and sometimes even cars and houses. Most don’t care about the girl’s personality. Some even end up marrying them, getting divorced and financing them for life. I think those guys are truly the fools.

I always tell guys just looking for sex with magazine babes that they’re better off just paying for it directly. No BS, usually better sex and they always stay the same age. You get what you want for a price you agree upon. I don’t see anything foolish if that’s what one wants.

If you’re looking for something more, it is most likely not going to come from a girl with looks in the 1%. Especially if you met in a public place.


16 posted on 03/07/2012 12:10:30 PM PST by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson