[KosmicKitty]

50 years ago - they could have adopted.

Now, pregnant teenagers keep their babies and make the their kids’ live miserable.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Now, pregnant teenagers abort their woulda-been firstborns, and second-borns too. And yeah, a lot are still opting to parent without a husband.

That's why there seemingly aren't any newborns available for adoption except for man-on-man partners... apparently the high bidders.

Amazingly, a lot of subfertility is caused by relatively minor hormonal and even nutritional deficiencies. I hope this couple has checked out NaProTech - Natural Procreative Technology, which addresses underling health issues and results in successfully achieving pregnancy naturally.

It costs a tiny fraction of what IFV costs,it doesn't kill your embryonic offspring, and it addresses women's health in a holistic way. It's the kind of advance that actually respects human beings.

[Boogieman]

“Now, pregnant teenagers keep their babies and make the their kids’ live miserable.”

While MTV cameras follow them around...

[Hetty_Fauxvert]

I looked into adoption very seriously when my husband and I were trying to have kids, and found that KosmicKitty is exactly right. It’s quite difficult to adopt these days unless you’re willing to take an older child, usually with issues of some kind, or go out of country. (I admire people who will take a kid with issues but frankly that idea scared me to death.) It’s expensive to adopt, as well. When people told me, “You should ‘just’ adopt!” I knew they had never taken five minutes to find out the realities of adoption these days.