Posted on 07/31/2017 10:10:10 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
India has an anti-Israel track record.
Ghandi was strongly anti-Semitic, hated Israel and corresponded with Hitler in a friendly way.
The lengthy article does not give a single bit of evidence for its premise.
I decided it was entirely trash when I got to the end and Bhutto was never mentioned in the context of being a potential suspect.
There’s also the matter of Indians reinforcing false Pakistani allegations against Israel with equally false allegations.
[ The aircraft had taken off smoothly and had climbed to a height of 4,000 feet. Most eyewitnesses said that the aircraft appeared to be in a spin and hit the ground leaving behind an enormous cloud of smoke. ]
Well, then. That certainly proves the Mossad did it. Now what, break out The Protocls of The Learned Elders of Zion?
oops Protocols.
Muslims blaming the Jews? What, did the Sun come up today again?
George: “uhhh....Astroturf! You know who invented Astroturf?!! The Jews!! The Jews hate grass.....”
I sure hope Mossad is keeping a close watch on Pakistan.
Pakistan is a danger to the entire world.
Loose nukes among Muslim extremists is NOT GOOD!
Oh I’m sure they have a plan. Like we do. Multiple contingencies.
They had a plan for Moscow if it came down to that. A tough target to crack but they had a designated squadron.
[ Excerpted from The Great Game ]
But have they read “The Big Game”?
George: So, um, you’ve read “The Big Game”, have you?
Eva (fawning): Yes I’ve read it and I’ve memorized it.
George: Tell me your impressions, I would love to hear what a young woman thinks of “The Big Game”.
Eva: Well, this is sort of embarrassing, but it’s changed my life. The way you analyzed the game? The way you identify the major players? Well it left me breathless. You’re a brilliant, brilliant man.
George: Well, it’s just a game. Remember that, kids.
Tim: Just a game. He’s so humble. Don’t forget what you wrote in the epilogue, the fate of the world depends on the outcome of this game.
George: Well, I was exaggerating a bit, just for effect.
Zia was most likely killed by the Soviets. The best theory I’ve read - which also explains the plane’s unusual flight pattern - consistent with the pilots being unconscious - described a nerve agent being released in the cockpit once the flight reached a certain altitude.
Of course, it could have been just an accident, and we’ll never know (unless the KGB/Soviet files are ever truly opened).
But Zia was providing the bulwark of the support of Afghanistan rebels to the Soviet occupation next door. No one wanted him dead more than the communists.
Did Mossad really have reason or interest to kill him?
Simon Foxx: I like your theory because it fits in with what was going on in those days.
However, we always can fall back on The Helen Thomas Theory which simply consists of “blaming everything on the Joosz”.
Helen is known in Hell as the “Devil’s Fart”.
Piss be upon her!
Why John Gunther Dean was allowed to continue in the State Department after his disastrous assignment to I Corps in Viet Nam can only be explained by his close relationship with Henry Kissinger. As for this pot-boiler, it needs to be read with skepticism.
Really don’t need a nerve against. Just flip a switch or faulty breaker that fails to pressurize the cabin. The masks deploy automatically in the passenger compartments but are manually deployed in the cockpit.
The pilots could simply have become anoxic and that’s all she wrote.
The altitude was said to be 4,000 feet
Okay, I confess that I killed Gen. Zia. I sent my psychic thoughts from America to crash his plane (even Pat Buchanan didn’t blame Israel for Gen. Zia’s death).
I do not like the idea that a diplomat is “determined” by “state department psychiatrists” to be mentally unstable due to stress, anytime
(it should be totally independent outside health professionals who make such a finding - for the individual, with the report going to the state department) -
but it is particularly disconcerting when the circumstances are that the diplomat is in strong disagreement with the top policy makers at the state department and/or White House.
However, I can’t imagine on what grounds Mr Dean had any reason to suspect Israel, other than some mad conspiracy theory. What was Israel to gain from it?
I would question most an “inside job” via a mole, a Zia opponent deep inside his “closest advisors”. Why else would anyone arrange a trip putting at possible risk Zia and his whole intelligence brass?
That’s pretty amazing!
Gee, we could have used you with (comment deleted) and when (comment deleted).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.