Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global Warming: Fake News from the Start
Townhall.com ^ | December 17, 2017 | Tom Harris

Posted on 12/16/2017 9:32:02 PM PST by Kaslin

By Dr. Tim Ball and Tom Harris

President Donald Trump announced the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change because it is a bad deal for America. He could have made the decision simply because the science is false, but most of the public have been brainwashed into believing it is correct and wouldn’t understand the reason. 

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and indeed the leaders of many western democracies, though thankfully not the U.S., support the Agreement and are completely unaware of the gross deficiencies in the science. If they did, they wouldn’t be forcing a carbon dioxide (CO2) tax, on their citizens. 

Trudeau and other leaders show how little they know, or how little they assume the public know, by calling it a ‘carbon tax.’ But CO2 is a gas, while carbon is a solid. By calling the gas carbon, Trudeau and others encourage people to think of it as something ‘dirty’, like graphite or soot, which really are carbon. Calling CO2 by its proper name would help the public remember that it is actually an invisible, odorless gas essential to plant photosynthesis. 

Canadian Environment Minister Catherine McKenna is arguably the most misinformed of the lot, saying in a recent interview, for example, that “Polluters should pay.” She apparently does not know that CO2 is not a pollutant.

And, like many of her political peers, McKenna dismisses credentialed PhD scientists who disagree with her government’s approach, labelling them “deniers.” She does not seem to understand that questioning scientific hypotheses, even scientific theories, is what all scientists should do. That is why the official motto of the Royal Society is “Nullius in verba,” Latin for “Take nobody's word for it.” Ironically, the Society rarely practices this approach when it comes to climate change.

Mistakes such as those made by McKenna are not surprising considering that the entire claim of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) was built on falsehoods and spread with fake news. 

The plot to deceive the world about human-caused global warming gathered momentum following creation of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). After spending five days at the U.N. with Maurice Strong, the first executive director of UNEP, Hamilton Spectator investigative reporter Elaine Dewar concluded the overarching objective of the IPCC was political. “Strong was using the U.N. as a platform to sell a global environment crisis and the global governance agenda,” wrote Dewar.

The political agenda required ‘credibility’ to achieve the deception. It also required some fake news for momentum. Ideally, this would involve testimony from a scientist before a legislative committee. 

U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO) was fully committed to the political agenda and the deception as he explained in a 1993 comment, “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing…” 

In 1988 Wirth was in a position to jump start the climate alarm. He worked with colleagues on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee to organize a June 23, 1988 hearing where Dr. James Hansen, then the head of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), was to testify. Wirth explained in a 2007 interview with PBS Frontline:

“We knew there was this scientist at NASA, you know, who had really identified the human impact before anybody else had done so and was very certain about it. So, we called him up and asked him if he would testify.”

Hansen did not disappoint. The New York Times reported on June 23, 1988:

“Today Dr. James E. Hansen of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration told a Congressional committee that it was 99 percent certain that the warming trend was not a natural variation but was caused by a buildup of carbon dioxide and other artificial gases in the atmosphere.”

Specifically, Hansen told the committee, 

"Global warming has reached a level such that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and observed warming...It is already happening now"

Hansen also testified:

"The greenhouse effect has been detected and it is changing our climate now...We already reached the point where the greenhouse effect is important."

Dr. John S. Theon, Hansen’s former supervisor at NASA, wrote to the Senate Minority Office at the Environment and Public Works Committee on January 15, 2009. “Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress.”

Hansen never abandoned his single-minded, unsubstantiated claim that CO2 from human activities caused dangerous global warming. He defied the Hatch Act that limits bureaucratic political actions, and, in 2011, was even arrested in a protest at the White House against the Keystone XL pipeline, at least his third such arrest to that point.  

Wirth, who presided at the hearing, was pre-disposed to believe Hansen and told the committee: 

''As I read it, the scientific evidence is compelling: the global climate is changing as the earth's atmosphere gets warmer. Now, the Congress must begin to consider how we are going to slow or halt that warming trend and how we are going to cope with the changes that may already be inevitable.” 

So, like Trudeau and other leaders duped by the climate scare, Wirth has either not read or not understood the science. In fact, an increasing number of climate scientists (including Dr. Ball) now conclude that there is no empirical evidence of human-caused global warming; there are only computer model speculations that humans are causing it and every forecast made using these models since 1990 has been wrong.

More than any other event, that single hearing before the Energy and Natural Resources Committee publicly initiated the climate scare, the biggest deception in history. It created an unholy alliance between a bureaucrat and a politician, that was bolstered by the U.N. and the popular press leading to the hoax being accepted in governments, industry boardrooms, schools, and churches across the world. 

Trump must now end America’s participation in the fake science and the fake news of man-made global warming. To do this, he must withdraw the U.S. from further involvement with all U.N. global warming programs, especially the IPCC as well as the agency that now directs it—the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Only then will the U.S. have a chance to fully develop its hydrocarbon resources to achieve the president’s goal of global energy dominance. 



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 1988; 2011; 2017; 201901; agw; canada; carbon; carboncredits; carbontax; climatechange; co2; crisis; econuts; energy; gas; gcf; globalism; globalwarming; gorbachev; greencross; greenenergy; ipcc; jamesehansen; keystone; keystonepipeline; keystonexl; mauricestrong; nasa; oil; parisagreement; peoplesconvoy; photosynthesis; pipeline; pipelines; scaremongering; trudeau; trump

1 posted on 12/16/2017 9:32:02 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Nonsense. Newspeak with the intent to impoverish and control. Always remember, government’s only role is to tax and control. When a license or permit is required, it is only for the purpose to tax and control, and not necessarily in that order.


2 posted on 12/16/2017 9:41:28 PM PST by Fungi (Eat a fungus or two today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; piasa; MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
spending five days at the U.N. with Maurice Strong, the first executive director of UNEP, Hamilton Spectator investigative reporter Elaine Dewar concluded the overarching objective of the IPCC was political. “Strong was using the U.N. as a platform to sell a global environment crisis and the global governance agenda,” wrote Dewar.

Very important information. Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev went on to form Green Cross International, which helped unify the environmental movement and the far left. Strong was also at the heart of various other schemes, including the U.N. Oil-for-Food scam.

3 posted on 12/16/2017 9:55:52 PM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

James Hansen has been caught red-handed in the past manipulating temperature data for his own agenda. We also have climategate to show that these “scientists” are lying to us. It’s not science, it’s politics.


4 posted on 12/16/2017 10:09:37 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
They have to change the climate to stop climate change.

They have to stop intolerance by being intolerant.

They have to stop inequality with inequal laws.

You do not even need to know the science to understand their goals are impossible.

5 posted on 12/16/2017 10:24:22 PM PST by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Trudeau and other leaders show how little they know, or how little they assume the public know, by calling it a ‘carbon tax.’ But CO2 is a gas, while carbon is a solid. By calling the gas carbon, Trudeau and others encourage people to think of it as something ‘dirty’, like graphite or soot, which really are carbon. Calling CO2 by its proper name would help the public remember that it is actually an invisible, odorless gas essential to plant photosynthesis.
I remember when they used the word "carbons" as a short name for "Chlorofluorocarbon" and blamed it for the so called Ozone hole in the Stratosphere. They outlawed Freon and found out that wasn't the problem so they moved on to CO2 being the great big envionmental meanie.

Warm Air Helped Make 2017 Ozone Hole Smallest Since 1988

Climate change is Agitprop.

6 posted on 12/16/2017 10:32:27 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

A couple of years ago, Dr Ball was sued in British Columbia’s Supreme Court, by Michael Mann, for lying about “climate change” not being real. Mann had to show all his research, he refused, and essentially the Court said no confirming research, means you have lied to Court. Big No, No. Ball expected to win big in settlement. Also, since Mann personally received hundreds of thousands of dollars in grant monies from the US Government, he will be liable for deceiving the Feds.


7 posted on 12/17/2017 1:24:46 AM PST by Dutch Duck (Dr Ball winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Climate change is a fact. Regional climate change that is. Plate movements over time change mountain ranges, ocean locations, and so forth. Most often it takes place over many millions of years. The great deserts like the Sahara come on fairly quickly. CO2 is one of many factors and can drive temperatures both ways. What the global warming folks do is manipulate geological phenomena for overnight riches and political control.


8 posted on 12/17/2017 2:09:52 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Canadia should elect a guy next time


9 posted on 12/17/2017 5:39:14 AM PST by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Forty three years ago I sold my nice place in the rocky Mountains when it was said it would be under a mile of ice by now, caused by THE COMING ICE AGE. Was through there two years ago and it was still ice free.


10 posted on 12/17/2017 6:56:25 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

bump


11 posted on 03/12/2022 9:23:37 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Reading this makes more understandable the sheer insanity we are seeing from Pelosi, Newsom, Trudeau, John Kerry, Horny, Strong, and others. They have been working on this Climate change scare scheme to get more power for 30 years and all their hard work was coming to a head when up popped Trump in time to cancel the Paris agreement, etc..


12 posted on 03/12/2022 9:32:25 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Laurance Rockefeller and others in the environmentalist and population control movement were working on it prior to that. Then when the Soviet Union broke up, the international Marxist movement needed new state sponsors and causes, so the German Green movement seized on "global warming", using the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro as a platform. Ron Arnold's books Trashing the Economy and Undue Influence from the 1990s document some of the early stages of the development. Gorbachev, Strong, Soros, etc. built on this.
13 posted on 03/12/2022 9:56:08 PM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson