The evidence was a lineup of women near and far who recounted some horrific rapes.
Hillary most upset this got out.
Really? I assume that when these horrific rapes occurred, the victims went directly to the authorities, and that's where the evidence came from ... not simply from the say-so of those doing the recounting, years and years after the fact.
Weinstein is a pig. But I fear where this is tending.
“The evidence was a lineup of women near and far who recounted some horrific rapes.
Hillary most upset this got out.”
So why is it a bunch of women accuse Harvey and he gets 23 years, while a bunch of women accuse Bill Clinton and... nothing?
Did you hear the actual testimony? I did. Your post is inaccurate. Oddly. And I’m not trying to defend him. I am a woman who believes many women such as in the case of Kavanaugh love railroading men.
Listen here to the real evidence you just posted about that doesn’t exist:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-harvey-weinstein-trial-unfiltered/id1494504816
Then come back and say what you just did.
“The evidence was a lineup of women near and far who recounted some horrific rapes.”
So just bunch of old broads well past working age looking to cash in about sex from 15-20 years ago.
Excuse the eye roll and OK.