Posted on 03/21/2020 7:13:02 AM PDT by Kaslin
Right now, our nation is experiencing a time of deep crisis. It is very important for the federal government to preserve the motivation for American entrepreneurs to create the best new treatment for the coronavirus. One way to do so is for the federal government to protect intellectual property from theft.
The United States is constantly fighting with China over the theft of intellectual property. It is one of the major sticking points in negotiations between the U.S. and China for a new comprehensive trade deal, because China is known to steal the intellectual inventions of American citizens. The Trump administration is working hard to cut a new deal that solves that problem.
Domestically, it is also important to protect the creations of inventors, to preserve the motivation for our nations’ best and brightest to find new drugs and other inventions to help fight the coronavirus. Some in Congress are working in the wrong direction to weaken intellectual property protections.
Our patent system is working well to protect inventions, yet some politicians are proposing changes in law to tinker with procedures to protect patents. The STRONGER Patent Act is an attempt by Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) to weaken patents in a way that will hollow out the Patent Office’s Inter Partes Review (IPR). The IPR is a check against patent fraud and a way to weed out patents that are clearly inappropriate under the law.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) grants patents. This is a core function of the federal government and is part of the enumerated powers mapped out in the Constitution. The USPTO is tasked with protecting the inventions of American entrepreneurs. They are also tasked with weeding out dubious patents. Congress created the IPR back in 2011 to provide an easy process to determine whether a patent is legitimate, or not, under the law.
The fake cures for the coronavirus are spreading like wildfire on the Internet. Most of these ‘cures’ will never be patented, because the promoters know that the invention would never qualify for a patent. Scientists, right now, are working overtime for legitimate cures and treatments that they will go to the USPTO for a patent, so they can be rewarded for inventing a cure and treatment for a virus that has already decimated the U.S. and world economies.
Expect some to take advantage of the coronavirus response to make some easy cash. Some will rush to file bogus patents after they look at the ones filed that are similar as a means to leverage some easy money out of the true inventors. The way it usually works is that a bogus patent is filed, then the real inventor has to hire lawyers to protect their patent from infringement. Expect a flood of lawsuits that will enrich lawyers, but not forward the ball for scientists and entrepreneurs who are searching for ideas to help people.
The IPR is a legal process that begins with a petition to a legal panel. Something called the Patent Trial and Appeal Board then gets involved and makes a determination if an IPR is needed. If the IPR strikes down the patent, there is a right of appeal, although the record on appeal has been a 90% upholding of the decisions of the IPR.
The IPR process has been effective in fighting the so called ‘Patent Trolls’ who make a living infringing on and attempting to steal ideas from other people. Josh Landau wrote on September 14, 2017, on a patent blog, “all in all, the IPR system has been incredibly effective at achieving these goals—I estimate that the implementation of inter partes review has helped plaintiffs and defendants avoid at least $2.31 billion in deadweight losses by providing an efficient system for challenging patents.” That is an important point, because if the economy can avoid a waste of over $2 billion in legal fees and other non-productive expenses, that cash can be used to hire new employees and invest in new inventions. This is one of the few examples of a government action that actually saves money for the private sector.
Our nation needs to preserve the motivation for our nation's best and brightest to come up with a response to the coronavirus. The IPR should be left intact to help with that fight.
Reason is out the window. We are one Presidential order away from Dystopia.
This is the most ignorant articles I have ever read. EVER. To use Coronavirus to attack our patent system while calling for keeping it strong is subterfuge.
The IPR created a whole new bureaucracy, heaped upon an existing bureaucracy. It has ruined our once strong patent system and taken it from the top ranked system in the world to the number twelfth system in the world.
Foreign agents, like the Chinese use the IPR to easily invalidate our patents and clear the path. At one point the IPR was invalidating parents at an 80% clip.
So, you pay a bazillion dollars to the PTO. With its right hand, the PTO says to you “we are going to rip this application apart and give it a thorough examination.” It takes years and years in most cases to get the patent granted.
Then, with its left hand the PTO proceeds to reply you what a crappy job it did in examining the patent in the first place and, after you pay a gazillion dollars again, revokes the very patent that charged you for in the first place.
Only our government could come up with such a scam!!!
And you know what, why would you file In the first place? Why, when you can use the IPR system to steal it. Why innovate when you can imitate? Steal it, set up cheap manufacturing abroad and bilk our economy.
And by the way, the Stronger Patent Act has no-partisan support, broad bi-partisan support.
And once again we see the “patent trolls” justification for the IPR!! Meanwhile, since the enaction of this, the Patent Trolls roll on.
Rather than trashing our patent system, especially for the small inventors and small entrepreneurs, there was a better, smarter way.
It would have been easy to determine if a plaintiff was a non-practicing entity (NPE) or not. Before the case was filed every plaintiff would have to plead use of the underlying patent or technology in support of a going concern.
-If the plaintiff was an NPE, then:
-Damages could have been limited
-If they lost the case, then legal fees would be shifted. The Troll would pay.
-Injunction as a remedy would be eliminated automatically.
If they had cut off the money, then these Patent Trolls would have evaporated. Instead, they killed the entire patent system. And you know who was lobbying the hardest? The same big-tech who nowmcensor Conservative voices.
What they did to the patent system is a PERFECT example of what they are doing in reaction to Coronavirus. The patient is sick. KILL IT!! That way we don’t have to worry about the patient being sick. Brilliant.
Or not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.