Now THIS is scary.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: Auntie Mame
2 posted on
06/04/2021 7:02:47 PM PDT by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: Auntie Mame
Everyone who actually read USA Today? That’s like 7 people.
L
3 posted on
06/04/2021 7:03:46 PM PDT by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is. )
To: Auntie Mame
That could be thousands of people who happened to click that story on. They didn’t know this might earn them a ‘visit’ from the ‘F-Troop’.
To: Auntie Mame
They must know something to ask for that specific time period.
5 posted on
06/04/2021 7:07:25 PM PDT by
Williams
(Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
To: Auntie Mame
6 posted on
06/04/2021 7:08:21 PM PDT by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
To: Auntie Mame
7 posted on
06/04/2021 7:08:55 PM PDT by
dead
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_vFiUUcBkc)
To: Auntie Mame
In going straight for the subpoena, Gannett said the FBI violated the Justice Department's policies… The Just us Department has policies?
8 posted on
06/04/2021 7:11:07 PM PDT by
immadashell
(New Planned Parenthood slogan: Black Babies’ Lives Don't Matter!)
To: Auntie Mame
To: Auntie Mame
Can’t believe on the side of USA Today this time.
10 posted on
06/04/2021 7:11:54 PM PDT by
MNDude
To: Auntie Mame
12 posted on
06/04/2021 7:12:59 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: Auntie Mame
It seems odd that they are demanding the records from such a specific 30 minutes in the evening…almost 12 hours after the original article was published.
To: Auntie Mame
Any aspiring thriller fiction writers out there? How do you construct a plot where this makes sense? Did the suspect get tipped off that the G men were coming and they think the ip addresses might lead them to the tipster?
To: Auntie Mame
A general warrant makes no sense, except for a fishing expedition. If they have a suspect identified, they could easily target the warrant at his Internet habits specifically.
My understanding is that we don’t post from USA today here, but suppose somebody here at FR posted that story. Everyone who clicked on it is getting scrutinized by the FBI? That has a terrible chilling effect on free speech when they make people afraid to go to legitimate news sites.
FR tends to post things very early as they happen. What if people here were investigated for clicking on new stories about January 6 during a certain time frame? The FBI has lost all respect for constitutional protections and their true meaning.
Just doesn’t seem any different than asking for a search warrant to search every house in a four block area to see what you find.
19 posted on
06/04/2021 7:24:02 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
To: Auntie Mame
Perp is David Lee Huber. I wonder if he’s any relation to John W. Huber, ex-U.S. Attorney.
20 posted on
06/04/2021 7:24:41 PM PDT by
mass55th
("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
To: Auntie Mame
Not that the FBI follows the constitution anymore, but;
“ no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.“
That does not leave room for “we want personal information about everybody who visited a main stream newspaper on a certain date and time”. This is pure Stasi.
22 posted on
06/04/2021 7:26:49 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
To: Auntie Mame
Anyone online needs to use an offshore VPN.
27 posted on
06/04/2021 7:32:16 PM PDT by
MAAG
(They that trust in the Lord shall be as mount Zion, which cannot be removed, but abideth for ever)
To: Auntie Mame
Out of control government is out of control.
31 posted on
06/04/2021 7:35:12 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
To: Auntie Mame
Reading something makes you guilty?
32 posted on
06/04/2021 7:37:10 PM PDT by
SisterK
(I can see Venezuela from my house)
To: Auntie Mame
33 posted on
06/04/2021 7:37:58 PM PDT by
Flick Lives
(“Today we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.”)
To: Auntie Mame
So reading a news article from a public newspaper online is a crime?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
