Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No gag order imposed in Trump case
The Hill ^ | 04/04/2023 | JULIA MUELLER AND ZACH SCHONFELD

Posted on 04/04/2023 1:29:49 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
haha to you Fat Bragg
1 posted on 04/04/2023 1:29:49 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I thought I read earlier there had been one ordered.

Hmmm...


2 posted on 04/04/2023 1:33:27 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the USofA & to the Constitutional REPUBLIC for? which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

It’s a trap.


3 posted on 04/04/2023 1:35:11 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Trump will make lemonade from these lemons - big backfire, incredibly weak case, total political persecution which will get Trump many many news votes.

EVEN NEIL CAVUTO SAYS THIS IS A NOTHING BURGER.


4 posted on 04/04/2023 1:35:28 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
The fat communist transgenders are going to get a butt pounding! Fat Bragg!


5 posted on 04/04/2023 1:35:49 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

SHOUT IT FROM THE ROOFTOPS, PRESIDENT TRUMP!


6 posted on 04/04/2023 1:37:41 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I’ve read speculation there would be one, but nothing certain. If they’d slapped a gag order on Trump — then Bragg and his blabby wife would have to shut up, right? Any lawyers out there who can say whether this is so? I am not a lawyer.


7 posted on 04/04/2023 1:38:58 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
They're trying to prevent the spectacle of an immediate 1st amendment filing--charging and then preventing the defendant from speaking, only to have 'leaks' in the press.

I think that action would not sit well with people, except the dimmest, clueless, and rabidly partisan.

8 posted on 04/04/2023 1:39:42 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

and the judge presiding over the case said he wouldn’t have granted one if it had.

This makes me think the judge isn’t impressed with this case.


9 posted on 04/04/2023 1:41:37 PM PDT by rdl6989 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27



10 posted on 04/04/2023 1:42:03 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd

Thanks. I have traditionally thought the attorney’s were
covered by it too. I’m not an attorney or close to the
professions, but I did stay at a run-down flea trap last
night.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(no offense to Holiday Inn)


11 posted on 04/04/2023 1:43:00 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the USofA & to the Constitutional REPUBLIC for? which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

No gag order. That would occasion a raised eyebrow as to the claimed left bias of this judge. I would love to see Bragg get sanctioned by the judge.


12 posted on 04/04/2023 1:43:51 PM PDT by ThanhPhero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Is that the Mauntauk Monster?


13 posted on 04/04/2023 1:44:33 PM PDT by rdl6989 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Rofl! I hope someone here knows the answer. I can’t help suspecting they didn’t go for a gag order because they did not want their own side silenced ... or supposedly silenced, but still leaking and blabbing.

I am of course livid about what they are doing to Trump, but hope this will wake up some MOR Republicans and Independents to the shockingly corrupt state of Democrat installed legal system. Trying to find some silver lining in this ugly cloud, maybe, maybe just wishful thinking.


14 posted on 04/04/2023 1:52:32 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

It is the thing that Bragg hopes to gag on.


15 posted on 04/04/2023 1:53:48 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989
and the judge presiding over the case said he wouldn’t have granted one if it had.

I. e. if a gag order had been requested.

16 posted on 04/04/2023 1:55:02 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I never watched)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Absolutely...Pelosi is overdosing on Chocolate Road Apple...Schumer is having funny dreams and Comey is standing tall.


17 posted on 04/04/2023 2:03:03 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The DA’s behavior indicates he is solely interested in preventing Trump from running, which a political goal and has nothing to do with enforcing the law. Democrats frequently play dirty and then declare that their motives are pure. Bragg is going to waste the money of the people of Manhattan to pursue a case he can’t win. He’s showboating for the mob. The appropriate way to deal with this conduct is a recall.


18 posted on 04/04/2023 2:13:24 PM PDT by popdonnelly (All the enormous crimes in history have been committed by governments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: ChicagoConservative27

Theory! The realize that the leaks were illegal, and to protect the leakers, they agree to no gag order.


20 posted on 04/04/2023 2:22:58 PM PDT by FrankRizzo890
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson