Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

HUH??????????????????????????????? Second of all Clinton had nothing to do with that boom. That was all Reagan.
1 posted on 11/15/2023 8:33:44 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27

During Clinton’s time the computer, Internet, software and Cell phone markets were being established. We will never see anything like that again.


2 posted on 11/15/2023 8:34:57 AM PST by Loud Mime ("The Real Constitution..and its real enemies" on Amazon. Check out the details, they are important.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

It was tech, not a POTUS.


3 posted on 11/15/2023 8:37:46 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I’m not going to hold my breath.


5 posted on 11/15/2023 8:38:04 AM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

BOTH residential and commercial real estate ARE CRASHING RIGHT NOW


8 posted on 11/15/2023 8:41:37 AM PST by oil_dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

LOL!! You mean that middle-class tax cut that Clinton promised while campaigning, but reneged on once he was elected?


9 posted on 11/15/2023 8:42:40 AM PST by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
This article is infuriating and I'm going to contact Joy Wiltermuth and tear her a new one.

Bill Clinton didn't create a boom. Bill Clinton selfishly starting printing money to fund his pet projects and destroyed the value of the dollar and our economic superpower status.

Don't believe me? Research Mexican Peso Crisis, quantitative easing, and correspond that to a chart of the S&P. If you print money the market artificially inflates.

Bill Clinton (and each president after him) destroyed America economically by keeping the practice going. Bill Clinton was the moment the adults no longer ran America.

11 posted on 11/15/2023 8:45:16 AM PST by Vision (Woke is communism and it has no place in America. Election Reform Now! Obama is an evildoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Uh, we don’t make anything anymore. Unless we start up again, nothing will change.


12 posted on 11/15/2023 8:46:37 AM PST by Tacrolimus1mg (Do no harm, but take no sh!t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Can’t make Hillary President without rehabilitating Bent Bill’s dirty dingus!


13 posted on 11/15/2023 8:47:56 AM PST by Aevery_Freeman (F**K Allah Y'all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Don’t rule out a Bill Clinton-style 1990s BUST........................


14 posted on 11/15/2023 8:48:52 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Clinton’s boom was due largely to the internet being made public... certainly wasn’t any of his economic policies.


16 posted on 11/15/2023 8:50:44 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I did find it odd that EXXON is going in on lithium batteries. Apparently they believe this lithium find in Arkansas will give them an advantage, and that there will be a market for EV’s.

There will be, but small in the end. Evidenced by auto manufacturers scaling down EV resources.

It’s worth a small investment,imho, but I wouldn’t put big bucks behind it.


17 posted on 11/15/2023 8:50:50 AM PST by chiller (Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'll go ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
> Don’t rule out a Bill Clinton-style 1990s boom for the economy <

Don’t rule out. Could be. Might happen.

Economists are like climate change scientists. They make worthless predictions, and get paid big bucks for doing so.

I just got my Magic 8-Ball back from the cleaners. I can’t decide if I’m going to be an economist or a climate change scientist. Maybe I’ll do both.


18 posted on 11/15/2023 8:51:22 AM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

We had better demographics back then. The Baby Boomers were in their prime during the ‘90s.


19 posted on 11/15/2023 8:52:31 AM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Funny how they start predicting this right before an election.


20 posted on 11/15/2023 9:00:10 AM PST by ProudDeplorable (Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. ~ Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
These financial drones have no idea what will take place any more than any of us with just a little education and data. None of that means you will be right at all though. Their advantage is that they are market makers and they see triggers much sooner than retail investors. By the time we see things that move the markets they are already baked in.

There is no perfect market, it does what it does, it goes up and down. Anyone who predicts is only right when they play and get lucky.

We do know when rates go up the market goes down and vice versa. We know the economy ebbs and flows in a cycle. When consumers get full they stop consuming for a bit. On it goes.

Clintoon had nothing to do with that boom. Reagan set it up for him, the bust of high inflation was beat and the economy had to recover. A recovery is not a boom, just a recovery. Obama never even had that.

Old money doesn't make money in a recovery, just the new money put in at the right time and waiting on growth. People that crow about growth in a recovery give me a royal pain in the ass. Until the markets get back to their previous peak there is no growth in the market. Saying anything else is either stupid or dishonest.

21 posted on 11/15/2023 9:00:49 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (Procrastination is just a form of defiance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

MarketWatch, like Business Insider, is a nothing but a mouthpiece for globalist liberals.

Often I find their articles to be false flags to be taken as contrarian signals.

Here, they are likely trying to suck in the last few buyers at a market top who will be left holding the bag when a market downdraft hits.


24 posted on 11/15/2023 9:10:54 AM PST by Eccl 10:2 (Prov 3:5 --- "Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

In the 1990s, the baby boomers were in their prime working years, age 35 to 55.

During the 2020s, the millennials will be in the same age bracket. This generation is even larger than the baby boomers.

So, yes, the demographic foundations are there for a boom. Public policy could either encourage a boom, or stifle it. If the millennials join with the boomers to elect a decent government, we might have something.


25 posted on 11/15/2023 9:13:44 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

“The era of Big Government is over!” Bill Clinton, State of Union speech, 1995.


26 posted on 11/15/2023 9:15:48 AM PST by Jumpmaster (U.S. Army Paratrooper. I am the 0.001%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The elites want to lure the sheeple deep into the stock market—and then enjoy watching them go broke when it crashes.


27 posted on 11/15/2023 9:18:06 AM PST by cgbg ("Creative minds have always been known to survive any kind of bad training." Anna Freud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The budget was never balanced under Bill Clinton. There were several factors which made it appear so. Mostly accounting gimmicks

Making some expenditures off budget. So you still had to pay for them but they weren’t listed in the budget as an expenditure

Counting Social Security taxes as part of the general funds intake

And probably the biggest thing was the treasury borrowing much more of its money on short-term t-bills because they offered a lower interest rate, the drawback being that there was the possibility that they would have to be renewed at a higher rate. So the balance budget was more a temporary lowering of the cost of financing the deficit and the debt.


33 posted on 11/15/2023 9:24:45 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson