Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ETCM

While I do somewhat agree with you, you’re still left with a
populace drastically smaller than it had been.

Even then, you’re still left with a high median age, unless
you kill off a massive portion of your populace.

The one child policy left them in serious trouble, and I’m
not sure your idea really works. It may. At what cost?


6 posted on 01/17/2024 10:27:31 PM PST by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the USofA & to the Constitutional REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
While I do somewhat agree with you, you’re still left with a populace drastically smaller than it had been.

China could kill 2/3 of their population, and still have a lower population density than the USA. Their population outstrips their natural resources, and is nearly impossible to manage. Previously, their population WAS their primary natural resource, now it is too old to be productive. Of course, this is placing an artificial limit of their current borders. There is a lot of land and natural resources surrounding them with low population density, ripe for expansion. Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Russia, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan...

Still, I'm not sure even the CCP would go so far as killing off their elderly and unproductive, and they probably couldn't survive the fallout.

11 posted on 01/17/2024 10:59:18 PM PST by ETCM (“There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil.” — Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson