finding the trial judge “erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts against persons other than the complainants of the underlying crimes.”
So you think if you are on trial, a parade of women not involved with the case and with no legal case of their own, should be able to come through and say you assaulted them decades ago without the slightest evidence?
Little different from a lynch mob.
Is that different than a “parade of character witnesses” singing the praises of the defendant?
Is what you described actually what happened in the case?