Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/26/2024 11:18:25 AM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ebb tide

Why not hair color? I can change that any day I want to as well.


2 posted on 04/26/2024 11:20:11 AM PDT by TonyinLA (I don't have sufficient information to formulate a reasoned opinion said no lefty ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Ya got to wonder what exactly is a conservative backlash....


3 posted on 04/26/2024 11:27:46 AM PDT by caww (O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide
The democrats are coming! The democrats are coming! Hide your babies! Hide your children!
4 posted on 04/26/2024 11:35:15 AM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

I HOPE there are more soccer moms with daughters that will be outraged by this ruling than there are sick individuals who pretend to think you can be any sex you want
And I Pray those soccer moms VOTE


6 posted on 04/26/2024 11:39:36 AM PDT by RWGinger (FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Likely an election year tactic to stir up his supporters in purple/swing states and make sure they go to the polls.


10 posted on 04/26/2024 11:45:50 AM PDT by Languager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

This is America dying under judgment.


12 posted on 04/26/2024 11:50:55 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Biden administration expands dismantling America dictatorships take a little time but we have it.


14 posted on 04/26/2024 11:55:30 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

DeSantis already said Florida will ignore biden’s unconstitutional edict.


16 posted on 04/26/2024 12:08:49 PM PDT by subterfuge (I'm a pure-blood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide
"...sparking conservative backlash"

LOL! Did they send a strongly worded letter in response?

17 posted on 04/26/2024 12:09:52 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

I am torn. I don’t like the gender lies but I don’t care about Lesbian sports either


18 posted on 04/26/2024 12:11:00 PM PDT by Fai Mao ( Starve the Beast and steal its food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

The law says “sex,” i.e. being biologically either male or female. This nonsense started when the term “sex” was extended to include “sexual orientation.” The courts should limit the law to what it actually says. The president does not have the authority to change it by decree.


19 posted on 04/26/2024 12:13:00 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide
And don't forget these:
8 Changes Biden Made To Title IX (https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4233881/posts)

20 posted on 04/26/2024 12:13:53 PM PDT by dayglored (Strange Women Lying In Ponds Distributing Swords! Arthur Pendragon in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Wouldn’t changing a law fall under the purview of Congress?


21 posted on 04/26/2024 12:14:40 PM PDT by grobdriver (The CDC can KMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Is law without legislation like taxation without representation?


22 posted on 04/26/2024 12:30:19 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again," )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

pathetic wimpy men who can’t compete with other man now will try to beat up on the women folk....soy boys rise again..


23 posted on 04/26/2024 12:33:04 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Biden..... “we gotta keep giving in to Satan!” .../sarc


25 posted on 04/26/2024 1:24:57 PM PDT by high info voter (Delivery )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide; caww; Moorings; plain talk; ViLaLuz; subterfuge; fella; Reverend Wright
On Friday April 19, Babylon Bee was able to get their article out on the same day the Department of Education DOE (Don’t you just love all these three letter agencies?) published their latest manifesto covering acceptable multi-faceted sexual experiences.

The DOE 1577-page Title IX ruling is titled Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance.

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-unofficial-final-rule-2024.pdf

Contrary to implications of the Bee article, the regulations don’t just cover college sports, but everything that happens in any school from kindergarten on up. In reading the regulations you will discover sexual stereotypes are male and female. In reading you will find court cases sited among comments, and that the DOE makes its own decisions about which to follow. If anyone has a problem, they can appeal to the Administrative Court within the DOE.

Now how does all relate to our Constitution? There is a huge back story here, but let’s begin with FDR. Franklin Roosevelt established a myriad of agencies staffed by unelected, unconfirmed experts who ruled and did not serve citizens.

Instead of legislating, a compliant Congress created legislators residing within impenetrable agencies. Instead of inherent individual liberties constraining government, a host of bureaucrats conferred rights upon and applied constraints to those who were citizens. Later Congresses followed the same path.

The best article I have found so far on the subject is called The History and Danger of Administrative Law by Philip Hamburger. I linked to it below. Such power harks back to discretions of English kings unrestrained by Parliament found in such places as King’s Council and the Star Chamber. Hamburger reminds us the Constitution says, “’All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States”. He then says, “The word ‘all’ was not placed there by accident. The Framers understood that delegation had been a problem in English history, and the word ‘all’ was placed there precisely to bar it”.

The History and Danger of Administrative Law

https://constitutionclub.wordpress.com/2014/10/01/the-history-and-danger-of-administrative-law/

Little remains of our Republic, but all may not yet be lost. On April 14, 2023, the Supreme Court in a 9 to 0 ruling struck a blow supporting our Constitution and individual liberties. The Court acted to reassert the jurisdiction of district and circuit courts and the legislative branch. Justice Elana Kagan delivered the unanimous opinion of the court saying, “One respondent attacks as well the combination of prosecutorial and adjudicatory functions in a single agency….They maintain in essence that the agencies as currently structured, are unconstitutional in much of their work”.

Supreme Court 9, Administrative State 0

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4145682/posts

Until that ruling permeates the Administrative State it looks like daughters and granddaughters are in for some unpleasant experiences from the predatory lizards that dominate government.

26 posted on 04/26/2024 1:53:04 PM PDT by Retain Mike ( Sat Cong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

This is evil.


35 posted on 04/27/2024 7:47:17 AM PDT by Captain Compassion (I'm just sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson