Posted on 04/29/2024 10:41:16 AM PDT by xoxox
Under new federal guidelines, an employer would be guilty of harassment for requiring someone to use a restroom that comports with his or her biological sex, or for referring to someone by a pronoun the person doesn’t want used.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission published the guidance on Monday. The guidance passed on a 3-2 vote, along party lines on Friday, a source familiar with the EEOC confirmed.
“Harassing conduct based on sexual orientation or gender identity includes … repeated and intentional use of a name or pronoun inconsistent with the individual’s known gender identity (misgendering) or the denial of access to a bathroom or other sex-segregated facility consistent with the individual’s gender identity,” the new enforcement guidance says.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...
This gutter garbage should disappear come January.
“The guidance passed on a 3-2 vote”
Not in Congress. In an agency, by appointees.
Can we un-elect such people? Why no. They have to be “impeached”. And then a criminal like Shoomer can just ignore 250 years of Constitutional law and dismiss the charges.
Obliterate the Federal Register. It was a creation of the nutcase Roosevelt and his Communist sycophants.
What “Gender” is “Hey You!”?
Does anyone wonder at all why the nation is going to hell in a handbasket?
Harass your personal congress-critter to stop this immediately. Not next year, now!
Our first revolution was, in part, about “no taxation without representation”.
We now have government laws created and imposed by unelected bureaucrats and ideologues. I don’t know a catchy slogan to sum up that problem, but the problem itself is worthy of a revolution.
Regulation without representation.
I’ll call them whatever they want to be called but I’m going to LMAO while doing it.
Using a pronoun that is inconsistent with reality is a lie. Many faiths are opposed to knowingly participate in a lie. If a company REQUIRES such participation, they are creating a hostile work environment for people of faith. As such, a clear violation of Title VII.
When my company released their recent pronoun policy, they were loudly pointing out that intentional “miss gendering” would be met with HR action. A quick question to the legal department confirmed that the use of preferred pronouns WAS NOT REQUIRED by policy.
Funny how that worked out when Title VII was called out.
This is vile.
The cancer continues, we need to purge, flush the toilet, clean out the septic tank
The EEOC was created by the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Almost all the Repubs voted with the liberals to create it.
Senate vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964
June 19, 1964
.................. Y N
Democratic 46 21
Republican 27 6
Thank the 17th Amendment.
I WOULD SHUT DOWN THE RESTROOMS-—INSTALL A ONE HOLE PORTA POTTY-—OUTSIDE & TELL THE FEDS TO POUND SAND.
That too. Along with the 19th Amendment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.