[where's_the_Outrage?]

I expect SCOTUS to punt back to the lower court(s) to further investigate the issue and staying the DOJ from continuing the case until the legal issues are resolved.

[lula]

There is only one way constitutionally to address wrong doing by a President. That is impeachment then removal by the Senate. SCOTUS better not punt this thing. They have no choice but to address what effect, if allowed to proceed this would have on any past or future Presidents.

As much as I believe Roberts is compromised, I don’t believe they will fail us here. MHO

[desertsolitaire]

Is it pretty well universal that such a path takes up past the November election?

[jacknhoo]

“I expect SCOTUS to punt back to the lower court(s) to further investigate the issue and staying the DOJ from continuing the case until the legal issues are resolved. ”
__________

Senator Linda Graham parroted that stance about a month ago, too.

[Recompennation]

The high court should take proactive steps to stave off corruption in the judicial system of this country then prosecute properly all true transgressions of our laws including the blatant and obvious election fraud that stole the 2020 election from President Trump.
This can’t stand

[Dilbert San Diego]

Some legal precedent regarding presidential powers is likely to come out of this case, whenever the decision is released.

That could be why justices were asking questions about issues unrelated to Trump’s specific situation. They know the results of this case could well be cited as a precedent years from now in some other case.

[cdcdawg]

“Rather than a laser-focused, deep dive into the details of Trump’s attempt to subvert the 2020 election...”

Trump’s what?

[Gay State Conservative]

That would be OK.But it would be better if SCOTUS ruled that the charges were unfounded,or unconstitutional, and a trial cannot proceed.

[teeman8r]

what trump’s legal team is doing right?

2 words... Habba habba