Yup
They have vets in he dakotas. Could’ve taken the pup to the vet to be put down
What would the purpose of such action be? All it shows it the person who does it is not willing to face reality, or take responsibility for their own decisions.
If farmers took all animals they own, which need to be put down, they would soon be out of business.
Such actions are unnecessary and irresponsible. They promote the insidious idea that all actions in life must be delegated to "experts" who are approved of by the government. It is a very bad idea.
Shooting a dog is one of the most humane ways to put it down.
As a vet told us decades ago when he had to put down a injured horse. When asked why he did not just shoot the horse, he said “Always use a needle in public. It looks nicer.”
Even vets hate to have to put down animals.
I remember a man who had to shoot a stallion. The stallion had just ripped his son to pieces. Same for a dog tearing up another pet or child.
Again, city people just don’t understand.
That’s weak sauce. When you’re rural, you take care of things yourself.
“hey have vets in he dakotas. Could’ve taken the pup to the vet to be put down”
I don’t believe a 14 month old pup is a big dangeorous animal. She could have given it to someone who would try to train it prior to blowing its brains out for not being compliant. She is backtracking and trying to cover her entitled ignorance and cruelty.
“Could’ve taken the pup to the vet to be put down”
Or you can shoot it in the head, which is faster. And no, it wasn’t “a puppy”.