Why the FEC witness testimony is irrelevant of course!
The Nazification of Justice.
Judge Juan is badly in need of an interview with Samuel Adams, who would have him tarred, feathered and run out on a rail.
Oh, this case will never survive the appeal process.
This case is total nonsense.
The entry of a payment to an attorney was absolutely accurate.
The law was meant for entirely different circumstances, like a bookkeeper who steals from a company and makes false entries to hide the theft.
But in any event, the entries here were accurate.
How is that going to play on appeal?
At this point, the appeals court should not only throw out the case with prejudice but should also call for the arrest of Judge merchan.
This has to be grounds for throwing out the case, doesn’t it?
What turd world banana republic allows a judge to keep a jury from hearing from experts who deal with these exact issues every day?
If justice was truly this prosecutor’s aim, then why not charge Hillary?
She used campaign moneys to start the false Russia claims and not even her own money.
Plus for Hillary it was directly and solely to influence the 2016 election, the same one Trump is being charged with influencing.
Trump has the reason he didn’t want Melania to find out about his allergies affairs.
Justice is supposed to be blind, not just a bit@h for the Democrats to whore out!
Could any of the jurors sue Merchan to be allowed to hear this testimony?
I’m sure they’ll announce the real charge during the sentencing.
Then again ...
FEC expert destroys the entire fiasco is why. The faked up “reason” for the entire farce. The FEC already looked at this from the correct FEDERAL point of view— and election law. There is no “there” there from the election point of view. And from the NY State law about the book ledger entry— NO state law was violated either.So WHAT is the crime being charged in the indictment in this case? This is not spelled out in the charging documents—? because it HAS to be to even be a trail. A judge gagging everyone he doesn’t like in the case... is not going to prove the case. Like the judge is also the prosecutor—something one sees all the time in the turd world, the one this judge comes from and his crummy a@@ daughter fundraising. Scum and scum daughter.
Bragg should withdraw the case- but noooo he’s a crook democrat to begin with, and under the direction of the Prosecutor he had nothing to do with .... assigning to the case! Again, who is in charge here? And, what IS the charge? Unsupportable by needless continuance.
It would be a shame if the Bear Jew “interviewed” the Colombian cartel stooge to a fare-thee-well...
BTTT
Falsifying a record suggests you think you’re knowingly being nefarious about calling a legal expense a legal expense.
Bkmk
HA.! Takes one to know one.. Every swinging richard in DC is guilty of that one, especially those from Harvard.
I think this whole thing is just a gigantic perjury trap.
The judge donated to Biden in 2020. He also donated to a “Stop Republicans” organization that year. He is a crook.
The judge has forfeited his right to life liberty and happiness
What really sucks is that no matter what they do. No matter what rules or norms they break no one on the left will ever think they went too far. That’s just not something we will see. They can hang him in a public square, rape his wife or shoot his child in the head and the new stations will explain why what was done was within the parameters of law.