Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jack Smith has admitted to violating the same law used against J6 defendants
American Thinker ^ | 05/09/2024 | Andrea Widburg

Posted on 05/09/2024 7:16:52 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Special Prosecutor Jack Smith has just admitted that he and other DOJ and FBI minions manipulated documentary evidence underlying the Mar-a-Lago case against Donald Trump. Everybody from Judge Aileen Cannon on down realizes this is bad. Still, I wonder how many people have noticed that Smith has admitted to doing what J6 defendants are accused and have been convicted of doing: Violating 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2). The statutory charges against the J6 defendants are a specious abuse of the law but they perfectly fit Smith’s admitted conduct.

One of the main tools in the DOJ arsenal against anyone near the Capitol on January 6, 2021, is § 1512(c)(2), which the DOJ claims means imprisonment for a person who “corruptly...obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding...” That is what the DOJ claims happened when ordinary Americans (a) exercised their rights of free speech and (b) usually inadvertently, entered onto Capitol land after masked agitators had removed “no trespassing” signage and fencing and after the Capitol police had opened the building’s doors. The penalty is fines and/or imprisonment, with the latter potentially as long as 20 years.

The Supreme Court, though, is hearing Fischer v. United States, which sees one of the DOJ’s victims contesting the DOJ’s assertion about § 1512(c)(2)’s applicability to the J6. The argument is that § 1512(c)(2) manifestly applies to a very narrow fact set; namely, corruptly interfering with evidence in an official investigation. Heck, it’s in the statute’s title: “Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant.” Every section of the statute manifestly deals solely with efforts to destroy or otherwise manipulate evidence in a matter intended to lead to a criminal indictment.

Nevertheless, to imprison ordinary Americans, the DOJ came down hard on subsection (c)(2) of the statute because it contains the phrase “official proceeding.”

(c) Whoever corruptly—

[snip]


(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: evidence; jacksmith; maralago; tampering

1 posted on 05/09/2024 7:16:52 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ve always said the DOJ has morphed into America’s KGB

Only far less competent.


2 posted on 05/09/2024 7:19:07 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just like I told you the worm is turning!!


3 posted on 05/09/2024 7:27:08 AM PDT by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
One of the main tools in the DOJ arsenal against anyone near the Capitol on January 6, 2021, is § 1512(c)(2), which the DOJ claims means imprisonment for a person who “corruptly...obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding

So what happened to the rep that PULLED THE FIRE ALARM INTERRUPTING A VOTE ON THE HOUSE FLOOR ?!?!?!

NOT A DAMNED THING !!!!!!!!


4 posted on 05/09/2024 7:45:20 AM PDT by mabarker1 ( (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of Congress!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

But he doesn’t get the same treatment.


5 posted on 05/09/2024 7:45:33 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The demonrat party uses violence as a political tool. Left wing violence is not prosecuted but at the same time they twist the law like a pretzel to go after the conservatives.

Hitler’s Brownshirts were the enforcement wing of the Nazi Party just as Antifa, BLM, are for the Demonrat party. There is no difference.


6 posted on 05/09/2024 7:55:22 AM PDT by cpdiii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Short drop, sudden stop for this POS.


7 posted on 05/09/2024 8:13:12 AM PDT by kiryandil (FR Democrat Party operatives! Rally in defense of your Colombian cartel stooge Merchan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Time to revoke federal agent, prosecutorial and judicial immunity.
Prosecutors routinely violate due process via witness intimidation, evidence tampering, multiple bogus charges. All designed to impoverish defendants and force plea deals.
Do these prosecutors or judges ever face fines, loss of licenses, and criminal charges? Only rarely if ever.
Those serving on federal juries need to consider nullification as the default position for all federal non violent cases.
Even if the Feds claim they have evidence. At this point, juries must do something to stop the steamroller


8 posted on 05/09/2024 8:53:13 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Civil disobedience by non-compliance; jury and state nullification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What did Smith and his fellow FBI thugs plant?


9 posted on 05/09/2024 9:29:52 AM PDT by tennmountainman ( (“Less propaganda would be appreciated.” JimRob 12-2-2023 DITTO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s OK when they do it; they’re above the law.


10 posted on 05/09/2024 10:30:21 AM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Biden regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is an actual violation of “obstruction of an official proceeding”, in the sense directly described in the law - unlike the usage against J6 folks (good and bad).


11 posted on 05/09/2024 11:16:27 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson