Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Bill O'Reilly And Fox News Biased? I Report, You Decide!
Toogood Reports ^ | December 27, 2001 | Isaiah Flair

Posted on 12/27/2001 8:50:46 AM PST by Starmaker

I will report, and let readers decide.

For quite some time now, I have been a major fan of the Fox News Channel, CNN´s 24-7 cable competitor.

CNN serves up news with a mix of male-bashing feminism, proactively atheistic secular humanism, and a bitter, America-last attitude. Their graphics look like something out of a garage home-editing chop shop. Their anchors robotically proclaim an ultraliberal party-line agenda which apparently flowed directly onto their copy sheets from Gloria Steinem´s misandric pen.

The Fox News Channel, in marked contrast, offers viewers Fair And Balanced coverage of breaking news events from around the country and around the world. Not only is their coverage accurate and immediate, it is presented in an interesting, engaging way. Their graphics, sets, and production values are all top-rate. Their anchors and show hosts, from Sean Hannity to Bill O´Reilly, offer tough, no-holds-barred commentary on all of the issues facing real people in America. They also engage in truly credible investigative reporting, which allows viewers to “get the scoop” and learn the inside details of a given story before they would anywhere else.

One aspect of the Fox News Channel that has become especially apparent since 9/11 has been their spin on our nation. After years of watching CNN and the so-called mainstream media present international stories from an “everything must be America´s fault” perspective, it is good to see the Fox News Channel (FNC) take another tack.

What FNC does is unabashedly present the news in a patriotic, America-first way. When you see a graphic-design flag appearing with their logo, you can believe that it represents more than just lip-service to our country. The FNC is blatantly in favor of the United States, and clearly proud to be a part of it.

This attitude reminds me of war coverage in WWII. In that era, there was no offering of moral equivalency to the Nazis. There was no attempt to understand Hitler. Instead, the media supported America and American soldiers in their battles against foreign enemies. The Fox News Channel is reviving that WWII-era patriotism, something which has been missed over the last number of decades.

And yet...

And yet, the extreme Left, in it´s own self-interest, is complaining greatly that the Fox News Channel is “biased”. Leading the charge with this complaint is the media watch organization, FAIR.org. FAIR.org complains that Bill O´Reilly, host of the popular show The O´Reilly Factor and author of the books The No-Spin Zone and The O´Reilly Factor, is very conservative.

They also suggest that FNC CEO Roger Ailes has a conservative bias. Just for argument´s sake, let´s say they are right. Not only about O´Reilly and Ailes, but about Tony Snow and Brit Hume. After all, both Hume and Snow have openly acknowledged their Christian faith, belief in moral absolutes, and love for their nation.

On the air, no less.

The real question is twofold: First, why did “media watch” organizations like FAIR.org fail to lambaste the obvious pro-feminist left-wing bias of CNN, ABC, NBC, and CBS (as so brilliantly proven in Bernard Goldberg´s great new book, Bias)? Could it be that FAIR.org is not interested in fair criticism of both sides of the political fence, but rather only in going after the Fox News Channel for boldly refusing to meekly carry the liberal party line?

Second, given that all of the broadcast networks news programs and CNN slant to the Left, what would be wrong with the Fox News Channel slanting to the right?

Slant away, FNC.

Your ratings are soaring because you appeal to a population which has long been poorly served by the mass media: Patriotic American conservatives.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rinowatch; thefactor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 12/27/2001 8:50:46 AM PST by Starmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
And Fair's point would be...?
2 posted on 12/27/2001 8:57:02 AM PST by X-USAF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
The real question is what Rupert Murdoch's agenda is for Fox News.
Here is a real eye opener
News Corporation List of Companies, Chairman and Chief Executive: K. Rupert Murdoch
Check the location of Chinabyte.com
Administrative Contact:
Li Wei
Xinnet
Haidian
Beijing Beijing 100044
China
tel: 86 10 68492333
fax: 86 10 68492758
yyang@newscorp.com.cn
FOX NEWS OWNER RUPERT MURDOCH SET FOR CHINA TV CLEARANCE;
MUST ENSURE COMMUNIST CHANNEL WIDELY AVAILABLE IN USA!


China AOL Time Warner and News Corp (aka Fox News) "Deal" - The REAL Story - from China
3 posted on 12/27/2001 8:59:33 AM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
First, why did “media watch” organizations like FAIR.org fail to lambaste the obvious pro-feminist left-wing bias of CNN, ABC, NBC, and CBS (as so brilliantly proven in Bernard Goldberg´s great new book, Bias)?

Actually, FAIR does criticize these organizations regularly for being biased. It's just that the bias they see is towards the conservative side. These organizations are owned by corporations, don't you know, and everybody knows corporations are all rabidly right wing.

4 posted on 12/27/2001 9:02:27 AM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
I suppose that even FOX NEWS has to cater to some extent to brain-dead advertisers. Thus FOX NEWS is more liberal than it need be. Those who think of FOX NEWS as biased in favor of conservatism are those whose brains died years ago, having overdosed on Dan Blather, Tom Brokejaw, Petah, or even earlier on the likes of Walter (I guess you could describe me as an unreconstructed 1930s radical Look Magazine late 1968 or early 1969) Cronkite. The left thinks it has some sort of constitutional right to a monopoly on news and views.
5 posted on 12/27/2001 9:03:30 AM PST by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Don't the Chicoms already control ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN???? Do they want ANOTHER network here????? What difference could it make? On the other hand, once the masses of Chinese men get a look at the major league babes on Fox News, they will have trouble identifying Chairman Mao!
7 posted on 12/27/2001 9:07:39 AM PST by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Please explain Whoraldo.

Eaker

8 posted on 12/27/2001 9:09:06 AM PST by Eaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
...boldly refusing to meekly carry...

Ha. Mr. Flair, meet Mr. Bulwer-Lytton.

9 posted on 12/27/2001 9:09:07 AM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boston_liberty
I just knew that O'Reilly would get in trouble some day for believing in minor restraints on abortion.
10 posted on 12/27/2001 9:09:11 AM PST by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Second, given that all of the broadcast networks news programs and CNN slant to the Left, what would be wrong with the Fox News Channel slanting to the right?

I have always had a problem with the word "slant". Either they are reporting news events or they are reporting lies. Bill O'Reilly isn't "the news", he is a political commentator. All political comentators tend to lean "left" or "right". The problem is that in the era of "news channels", people mistake actual "news" with the 20 hours a day worth of political opinions. Of course, many Americans are no longer smart enough to differentiate this themselves. They turn of Fox or CNN to see "news", but there is rarely news on the channels. They just assume "political opinions" are news.

11 posted on 12/27/2001 9:09:18 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Starmaker
Fox News is abiding by that old capitalist tradition of finding a need (viewers tired of the liberal dominated network/CNNmedia) and filling it (balanced views). Judging by their ratings success and increasing viewership over the liberal biased stalwarts, I'd say they're business plan is working.
13 posted on 12/27/2001 9:15:09 AM PST by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Leading the charge with this complaint is the media watch organization, FAIR.org. FAIR.org complains that Bill O´Reilly, host of the popular show The O´Reilly Factor and author of the books The No-Spin Zone and The O´Reilly Factor, is very conservative.

They also suggest that FNC CEO Roger Ailes has a conservative bias.

Do they give any examples of right-wing bias at FOX? Surely, it takes more than poliutical affiliation to prove bias because then the other networks are by definition overwhelmingly biased to the left. There are plenty of examples in Goldberg's book Bias about left-wing bias at CBS and other networks. What are the examples of FOX's biased reporting?

14 posted on 12/27/2001 9:40:23 AM PST by Hagrid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boston_liberty
Bill O'Reilly is hardly a conservative. At times, he sounds like a socialist

No, no, no, no, no. He votes for the best candidate as stated in his book The No Spin Zone.

He is a hard-hitting interviewer and takes no prisoners, especially towards the lefties (Sharpton, Susan Sarandon, George Cloony, Susan Estrich and all others). He exposes the corruptness of our government and the billions and billions of wasted taxpayer dollars (i.e., the millions and millions Clinton gave to Haiti.)

He is a great investigator and one of the few honest journalists looking out for hard working Americans.

15 posted on 12/27/2001 10:14:09 AM PST by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
FNC may not be perfect, but it is certainly the best news channel available today. My theory about Fox is that they are labeled right-wing or conservative because people have been spoon fed liberal pablum for so long that when something unbiased comes along, it appears to be right-wing.

Also, one does not have to be non-judgemental in order to be non-biased. In order to report fairly about Clinton, one would have to be critical. Not being critical of Clinton would be biased for the left because there is simply nothing positive or even neutral to say about a traitorous, murdering, rapist.

16 posted on 12/27/2001 10:31:41 AM PST by Leesylvanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Leesylvanian
FNC may not be perfect, but it is certainly the best news channel available today. My theory about Fox is that they are labeled right-wing or conservative because people have been spoon fed liberal pablum for so long that when something unbiased comes along, it appears to be right-wing.

Absolutely.

Plus, when the conservative viewpoint is available in equal proportions to the liberal one, the conservative one usually wins the argument. Common sense based on reason and logic usually does. Since NBC/CBS/ABC/CNN only feature the conservative viewpoint 5-10% of the time, they are biased.

18 posted on 12/27/2001 10:58:35 AM PST by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Actually, FAIR does criticize these organizations regularly for being biased. It's just that the bias they see is towards the conservative side. These organizations are owned by corporations, don't you know, and everybody knows corporations are all rabidly right wing.

FAIR hardly ever seems to criticize anyone for anything. I get oodles of hard data from the Media Research Center proving liberal media bias every single day, but all I ever get from FAIR is one press release every three weeks or so.

19 posted on 12/27/2001 11:02:55 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson