Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RIORDAN ON ABORTION.
San Francisco Faith ^ | February 2002

Posted on 01/31/2002 11:27:58 PM PST by nickcarraway

RIORDAN ON ABORTION. In his bid for the Republican gubernatorial nomination, former Los Angeles mayor Richard Riordan has called for more taxpayer funding for abortion. In a November 8 interview, Los Angeles Times columnist, George Skelton asked Riordan "whether he had core political beliefs." "My basic conviction," said Riordan, "is what is in the best interest of the poor. We need to have successful businesses so there will be quality jobs.... We should fire bureaucrats in school districts who fail poor children." And, said the Republican contender, "the poor should have the same option on abortion that the rich have. Government should supply the resources so poor people have a choice." "I just lost the Republican nomination," said Riordan after his revelation, though his stance on abortion is no secret. The official "Riordan for Governor" website quotes the candidate as saying that he is "in favor of the right for women to make their own moral choice. I believe economically disadvantaged women should have access to medical funds, so they have the same right to make the choice as any other woman. You're not really giving the choice to somebody unless they have the wherewithal (to pay for an abortion). I'm against third-trimester -- or late-term -- abortions," Riordan continued. "Underage females should get permission from their parents. I don't like abortion. but a woman has the right to make her own choice."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; christianlist; michaeldobbs; simonforgovernor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 01/31/2002 11:27:58 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway;JohnHuang2;nopardons;Nitro
any FReeper who would vote for RearEnd deserves to be banned
2 posted on 01/31/2002 11:31:09 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"My basic conviction," said Riordan, "is what is in the best interest of the poor. I say put them to work! That would be in the best interest of EVERYBODY.
3 posted on 02/01/2002 12:15:04 AM PST by irishtenor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I'll surely second that motion. It seems some people like controversy so much that they will go to any lengths to get attention for it. Cutting out his tongue might be a good first step. Similar to abortion techniques. What say you?
4 posted on 02/01/2002 12:18:16 AM PST by Missiekins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor
Isn't this the same fellow who wants illegal aliens rewarded with a gravy train of state benefits? I could vote for a pro-choice candidate as long as he made clear he didn't think abortion should be a woman's first option, but that's not true with Dickie Pooh. He's even more extreme in his anti-life views than Gray Davis. No way I could ever vote for him since he strikes me both as completely dishonest and unprincipled a politician to be found on the California scene. His only real principle is to tell people what they want to hear to gain power. He's a 2002 Bill Clinton in Republican drag.
5 posted on 02/01/2002 12:20:48 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor
Let them eat cake...and have abortions?
6 posted on 02/01/2002 12:21:04 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Missiekins
dissect and extract? or whatever
7 posted on 02/01/2002 12:21:33 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
He's a 2002 Bill Clinton in Republican drag.

His slip is showing, Badly.

8 posted on 02/01/2002 12:24:46 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I cannot vote for anyone how advocates the taking of innocent life. Never. That is my first benchmark for getting my vote.
9 posted on 02/01/2002 12:28:39 AM PST by irishtenor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor
Should have been WHO.
10 posted on 02/01/2002 12:29:44 AM PST by irishtenor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor
I agree with you in principle. I'm curious though about how you would vote in a state where the voters support pro-choice candidates.
11 posted on 02/01/2002 12:33:12 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Being is the Liberal State of Washington, it is difficult. If given no choice, I either write in myself, or don't vote for that position.
12 posted on 02/01/2002 12:38:17 AM PST by irishtenor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor
Yeah. Ideally I'd vote for a pro-life candidate, but if there wasn't one I'd vote for the candidate willing to at least reduce access to abortion than for one who wanted women to have instant access to it. Dickie Pooh strikes me as one of the latter type of a pro-choice candidate and I could never vote for someone who thought abortion was ooh a great option for women.
13 posted on 02/01/2002 12:58:00 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: *CalGov2002
*CalGov2002 group list
14 posted on 02/01/2002 1:24:15 AM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all
Wow, this guy is bad. His opponent is conservative Bill Simon. Here is what Simon had to say in his statement for Sanctity of Life Sunday, January 20th:

January 20, 2002

Dear Friend of Life:

Americans today are united like never before. Today, more than any time in fifty years, people of all faiths, all income levels and backgrounds have joined together under the banner of proud and principled Americans.

Yet there is still one issue that divides our nation. As we ponder the passing of this day that marks twenty-nine years since abortion-on-demand was legalized in this country, we know that the topic continues to cause a great deal of pain and division.

We Americans have come together for our common good and mutual support. The question remains whether we can now come together once again - to find some common ground on this terrible issue that divides us.

No one is willing to give up his or her deeply held beliefs - I know I am not. But there must be reasonable things that reasonable people can agree upon.

About 1.5 million abortions take place in this country every year. Can we agree that this is certainly too many? Can we agree to work together to reduce the number of abortions? Can we agree to spend funds on life-affirming activities such as abstinence education for teenagers and tax relief for families that adopt?

Labels on storefronts, packages and gas pumps warn us every day about the health hazards we face from various products and services. Can we not agree that women seeking abortions should understand the present and future health risks that they too face?

Can we agree that abortion clinics and the doctors who work in them should be subject to the same health, safety and reporting requirements that all other medical doctors and clinics must abide by? Can we not agree that the health and safety of those women is one of our highest priorities?

If we are ever to come together on the serious issues that divide us we must find common ground to begin a dialogue. America is too great a nation and our people are too strong a people to let our differences overcome our strengths.

This January 22nd many of us will shed tears for the millions of children who never saw the light of day. It doesn't have to be that way. Can we not agree that now is the time to begin the process of coming together, with the goal of some day putting this divisive debate behind us? There are issues we can agree on. Let's work together to find them.

Sincerely,

Bill Simon

 


15 posted on 02/01/2002 9:12:12 AM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Proud2bRC
One more Catholic politician chooses manna
16 posted on 02/01/2002 9:16:11 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Sounds like he is trying to have two sides of the same coin. I understand he also contributes money to pro-life groups.
17 posted on 02/01/2002 9:16:13 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
ABORT RIORDAN!!
18 posted on 02/01/2002 9:17:40 AM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all
Here is what Simon said in the first gubernatorial debate in San Jose when a reporter asked the GOP candidates if the party should remove the prolife plank from our platform:

We need to be inclusive, but we also need to stick with our principles and there’s no question about that. We need to be straightforward about what those principles are.

I would not be in favor of removing that issue from the platform.

I am prolife. I believe abortion is wrong, but I understand the law. I believe what we should do is try to see fewer abortions and I believe that will take a number of years to change the hearts and minds of the voters – to sponsor a culture of life.

Bill Simon, January 22, 2002

Simon For Governor!

19 posted on 02/01/2002 9:18:46 AM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
I understand he also contributes money to pro-life groups.

Never heard that. Davis is trying to portray him as pro-life in commercials.

20 posted on 02/01/2002 9:18:54 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson