Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S.C. Flag Protest Headed for Highway Stops
FoxNews ^ | Tuesday, February 05, 2002 | Jonathan Serrie

Posted on 02/05/2002 6:41:39 PM PST by Michael2001

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:32:29 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

COLUMBIA, S.C.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Our family will vacation in South Carolina this summer and I invite others to do the same.
1 posted on 02/05/2002 6:41:40 PM PST by Michael2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
I never even considered vacationing there...until now!

I'll be slipping quarters into every reststop-coke machine I see, too.

2 posted on 02/05/2002 6:43:54 PM PST by Tigercap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigercap
see you there! a good vacation this summer for a guy from boston, mass... this is another step BACKWARDS in "race relations" complements of the NAACP. ill do as much business in SC as possible.
3 posted on 02/05/2002 6:47:58 PM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
        [...]
       And indeed, like the Simpson verdict itself, Farrakhan's march provides the mirror for a
       civil-rights establishment so debased by radical strategies, double standards, and shameless
       appeals to white guilt that it has become an exercise in self-parody. (When Johnnie Cochran
       appeared before the Congressional Black Caucus and compared the Simpson trial to the Dred
       Scott case and the Brown v. Board of Education decision, there was not even a murmur of
       dissent.)

       Over the last three decades the moral voices of the black community were first muted
       and then drowned out, as dissent from the desperate search for psychological and fiscal
       entitlements that is now euphemistically referred to as the "civil-rights agenda" was ruthlessly
       crushed. In the wake of the trial, writer Richard Rodriguez commented sadly that the two hundred
       years of moral capital stored up by the civil-rights movement had been squandered to acquit O.J.

       He is only partially correct. That capital has actually been wasted incrementally all along the long
       march down the mountain—from the summit Martin Luther King Jr. achieved into the fever
       swamps of today—as racial hate-mongers like Farrakhan and charlatans like Al Sharpton have
       replaced King and Medgar Evers; as lying delinquents like Tawana Brawley (who falsely claimed
       to have been abducted and abused by whites) have replaced true victims like Emmett Till (a
       black teenager brutally murdered in Mississippi in the fifties by whites who believed be had
       whistled at a white woman); as figures like the ever corrupt Marion Barry, the felon Rodney King,
       the thug Damian Williams, the cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal, and now O. J. Simpson himself have
       all been embraced as heroes of the struggle as worthy of admiration as Rosa Parks.

       This inability to discriminate right from wrong and heroes from perpetrators suggests that what now
       calls itself the civil-rights movement has not only lost its moorings and its morality, but in some
       sense has lost its mind as well.

By Peter Collier and David Horowitz
 

4 posted on 02/05/2002 6:51:35 PM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
Count me in for a nice long Vacation in SC this year.

God Bless America

5 posted on 02/05/2002 6:58:08 PM PST by JustAnAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
They stabbed the SC tourist industry, which supported their campaign to remove the flag from the dome, right in the back and a representative of that industry said as much tonight. The NAACP has taught them a hard lesson. A lesson that flag supporters warned them about over and over. One wonders if business leaders in other southern States took notice.

They also stabbed the political leaders who went out on a limb for them. Those leaders took a political hit in removing the flag and thought that the issue was now behind them. What they got for their efforts were dedicated lifelong opponents and a continuation of the controversy on the news every night.
6 posted on 02/05/2002 7:01:59 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
The boycott is okay with me. Will have the reverse effect and it keeps them busy and off the streets.

Richard W.

7 posted on 02/05/2002 7:03:04 PM PST by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
They stabbed the SC tourist industry, which supported their campaign to remove the flag from the dome, right in the back and a representative of that industry said as much tonight.

The people of South Carolina should run that flag right back to the top of the state house in Columbia. What's the NAALCP going to do? Boycott? I'll be spending more money than ever in South Carolina this year, and if I see those NAALCP bozos at the rest areas, I'll show them my receipts.



8 posted on 02/05/2002 7:07:01 PM PST by who knows what evil?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
I wouldn't boycott SC over the issue, but Blacks Americans who are offended by the Confederate flag have a point.

The Confederacy, despite all of the noble talk about sovereign state rights, was a breakaway from the United States, a subversive movement of states against the general welfare of the nation, and for all the moralistic preaching of the "rightness" of states to break with the Union, the real question wasn't state sovereignty, but perpetuation of slavery.

Why would anyone defend the symbol of sedition against the United States -- a flag under which an insurrection was waged against the nation -- and sedition in the name of protecting the "peculiar institution" of slavery?

I've had this discussion with southerns I've met, and I've pointed out that if the break with the Constitution and the United States had truly been about state sovereignty, perhaps the Confederacy had an arguable point. But because state sovereignty was principally promoted as a means of supporting slavery, it is indefensible.

I had two ancestors who fought in the Civil War for the Union; one of them was at Gettysburg, one was at Appomattox. One was from a New England state; one was a volunteer from New Brunswick, Canada, who joined a regiment from Maine because of a hatred of slavery. Frankly, as a white, the Confederate flag is offensive to me.

The Confederacy lost the war; get over it!

9 posted on 02/05/2002 7:07:16 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
South Carolina has 29.8 percent of its population listed as African-American. Any NAACP boycott of SC will hurt them as much as any white person. So either the NAACP isn't paying attention to that fact or they are just hatemongers.

Most South Carolinians don't even have a rebel flag in their possession.They just want to be American.

However ,the major highways are always full in Souh Carolina .The boycott doesn't really seem to have much steam. I don't think the NAACP bigwigs are ready to give up their SC made BMW's.

10 posted on 02/05/2002 7:08:24 PM PST by Dubya-oh-seven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Won't the NAACP look clever if/when their asinine boycott of SC tourism begins to cost some of their brethren their JOBS???
These buffoons will never be satisfied; the very existence of the NAACP depends on constant conflict and bogus charges of racism. If they screw some of their own in the process...they couldn't care less.
11 posted on 02/05/2002 7:08:42 PM PST by TheGrimReaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
South Carolina Attorney General Charlie Condon said he will sue the civil rights group if it sends protesters to welcome centers and rest stops. "It's not a threat, it's a promise," he said.

While the AG is free to do what he wants, it seems like overkill.

SC is a great state, and the protesters will be only hurting themselves.

Suing them will only serve to give unwarranted publicity to a bunch of 60's radicals who will never be satisfied as long as the USA is not a communist nation.

12 posted on 02/05/2002 7:11:02 PM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Your problem is in your damn yankee gene pool and your opinioin isn't worth 2 cents!
13 posted on 02/05/2002 7:12:25 PM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
He does have a great point, how could you defend slavery?
14 posted on 02/05/2002 7:32:26 PM PST by illbenice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
I wouldn't talk about gene pools, if I were you. We don't marry our cousins.
15 posted on 02/05/2002 7:35:43 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: lonestar
But the point remains: With all the important issues to fight for in our nation, in our culture, I can't see spending an inordinate amount of energy defending the Confederate flag. That flag is not the flag of my nation.
17 posted on 02/05/2002 7:38:48 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2/75 RANGER
My man, the 4 years under the stars and bars was the entire history of the confederacy. The union on the other hand hand enacted the 13th ammendment and abolished slavery. If the south had one would they have abolished slavery? If they would have which southern law makers were against slavery? Enlighten me I never heard of any and I'm sure at least one had a brain.
18 posted on 02/05/2002 7:42:02 PM PST by illbenice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
You get over, windbag.

You've let the media and politicians drill the "Racist" label into your head. I would think that someone with any intelligence would realize that it is a flag that represented the Battles of the Civil War. It's not even the National Confederacy flag (Stars & Bars).

You go onto talk about slavery. Do you honestly think that slavery would have lasted much longer? Definitely no. Mechanization was the wave of the future.

Some of you people act as though someone is a backwards, rednecked racist for flying the Confederate Battle Flag. Furthermore, you act as though they are doing it in defiance to the United States and American Blacks. Only for a few exceptions, that is not the case. Most individuals who fly a Confederate flag fly an American flag right beside it. Furthermore, most aren't thinking about blacks. That's a media-induced bs-laced propagandic tool to get you to hate the south. Evidently you fell for it. It's about heritage. The political correct whores have been trying to destroy Southern Heritage. Apparently, you don't believe that people should remember their heritage.

19 posted on 02/05/2002 7:44:28 PM PST by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
Does this mean they will not hold Black College Week in Myrtle Beach next spring? I'm sure the hotel owners would be happy to avoid the annual devastation that is accrued during that week. I, on the other hand, will up my one visit to Myrtle Beach each year to two this year.
20 posted on 02/05/2002 7:45:51 PM PST by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson