Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate ignores veto threat on trade bill, keeps critical amendment alive
Associated Press / SFGate

Posted on 05/14/2002 12:30:04 PM PDT by RCW2001

JIM ABRAMS, Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, May 14, 2002
©2002 Associated Press

URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/05/14/financial1508EDT0185.DTL

(05-14) 12:08 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --

Ignoring a veto threat, the Senate on Tuesday kept alive an amendment to a major trade bill that the White House said would cripple its ability to negotiate new international agreements.

The Senate, by a 61-38 vote, rejected an effort to table, or defeat, an amendment by Sens. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, and Mark Dayton, D-Minn., that would give Congress powers to delete language from trade pacts dealing with American trade laws.

The Senate still needs to vote on passage of the amendment, and White House officials struggled to find support for an alternative that left the president's trade negotiating authority intact.

"While our country's future trade policies are debatable, the right of Congress to participate actively in setting those policies is not," said Dayton in support of his amendment.

The Senate is considering legislation to give the president so-called fast track authority, allowing him to negotiate international trade deals that Congress can approve or reject but cannot amend. Congress has denied the White House that authority since 1994 and Bush says it is essential as the United States enters a new round of World Trade Organization talks.

Craig, a member of the Senate Republican leadership, and Dayton would amend that authority to give Congress the power to delete from any fast track deal any part of the agreement that affects laws protecting U.S. industries from foreign subsidies and dumping.

But Commerce Secretary Donald Evans, in a letter Tuesday to Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, said the amendment derails fast track, or trade promotion authority, "without justification." He said he would "strongly recommend to the president that he veto legislation that included this amendment."

He said the legislation already directs the president to "preserve the ability of the United States to enforce rigorously its trade laws." If Craig-Dayton passes, he said, "other countries will refuse to discuss their own sensitive subjects, unraveling the entire trade negotiation to the detriment of U.S. workers, farmers, and consumers."

The letter was also signed by Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick.

White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said the president "understands the concerns made by his cabinet members." He said the veto threat was made because the amendment "would seriously undermine the cause and the purpose of free trade."

Craig, who has rejected administration requests that he withdraw the amendment, said it would strengthen the president's negotiating hand by sending a clear message to U.S. trading partners that Congress stands behind U.S. trade remedy laws.

But at a news conference Tuesday, leaders of the business community joined senators in warning that the amendment was a "poison pill."

"It essentially emasculates trade promotion authority and renders all of our work useless," said Jerry Jasinowski, president of the National Association of Manufacturers.

Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, who last week helped work out a compromise on language sought by Democrats to increase benefits for trade-dislocated workers, said Craig-Dayton was a "bipartisan protectionist amendment" that would "destroy our ability to negotiate reductions" in trade barriers.

He said sponsors of the legislation are working on a counter proposal that would give members of Congress a greater advisory role in international negotiations without changing the fast track procedure.

Baucus and Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, chief sponsors of the trade bill, tried to head off another contentious issue with an amendment, adopted 98-0, to assure that foreign investors won't take unfair advantage of U.S. laws to file lawsuits. But Rep. John Kerry, D-Mass., who is preparing an amendment on the subject, said the Baucus-Grassley amendment didn't go far enough.

The trade package also provides health benefits for workers who lose their jobs because of foreign competition and extends a program giving lower tariffs for goods from the South American countries of Colombia, Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador.

©2002 Associated Press  


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: freetrade

1 posted on 05/14/2002 12:30:05 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *"Free" Trade
*Index Bump
2 posted on 05/14/2002 1:08:54 PM PDT by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Ignoring a veto threat...

Instead of rereading "The Very Hungry Caterpillar", Bush’s time might be better spent reading “The Boy Who Cried ‘Wolf!’”

3 posted on 05/14/2002 1:16:49 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I'm confused.

Can someone explain to me why Bush will veto this bill because of this ammendment and why the ammendment is bad?
4 posted on 05/14/2002 5:45:11 PM PDT by PeteF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson