Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Divvying up North Natomas
Sacramento Bee ^ | July 27, 2002 | By Mary Lynne Vellinga

Posted on 07/27/2002 10:41:46 PM PDT by farmfriend

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:41:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

After a year of quiet negotiations, Sacramento city and county officials this week unveiled a landmark agreement that would open 10,000 acres of Natomas farmland to development, while preserving 10,000 acres of open space along the Sacramento River and around Sacramento International Airport.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: environmental; government; natomas; openspace
This is in relation to the issue I brought up at our meeting.
1 posted on 07/27/2002 10:41:46 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: comwatch
Do you want to try out your new ping list?
2 posted on 07/27/2002 10:42:50 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; forester; marsh2; sasquatch; sauropod; B4Ranch; Free the USA; madfly
Ping.
3 posted on 07/27/2002 10:44:47 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Buy real estate in Davis, CA. It is a good investment. Many positive aspects - no negatives. Enjoy.
4 posted on 07/27/2002 10:57:05 PM PDT by Silas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Silas
no negatives

You've got to be kidding!!!!

If you are in Davis, would you like to join our chaper? Next meeting is Aug. 21st.

5 posted on 07/27/2002 11:09:01 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Sacramento Chapter on the Move
6 posted on 07/27/2002 11:12:24 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
At the same time, the county would purchase land from property owners for open space buffers, often a mile wide along the Sacramento River and Sutter County line.

Purchase land from property owners for open space buffers. Nice. Wonder how many of those property owners are going to be willing sellers?
7 posted on 07/28/2002 5:03:35 AM PDT by jaq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jaq
Sac. City, at one piont, was trying to comdemn 9 parcels from 5 different owners because they didn't want to pay for the development rights. It must be noted that the Conservancy refuses to give up development rights on the land it owns in this area.
8 posted on 07/28/2002 1:28:50 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: adversarial; BibChr; blaze; BornOnTheFourth; budwiesest; Burlem; c21sac; CalConservative; ...
Pinging with the new Chapter list. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed.
9 posted on 07/28/2002 1:31:23 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame; diotima
Out of area ping.
10 posted on 07/28/2002 1:32:07 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
bump for further play.
11 posted on 07/28/2002 1:51:07 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Silas
I wouldn't buy anything in Davis.
12 posted on 07/28/2002 3:01:18 PM PDT by steveo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: steveo
Why not?
13 posted on 07/28/2002 3:25:32 PM PDT by Silas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Editorial: A deal in Natomas
14 posted on 07/29/2002 9:28:57 AM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
They tried to get okay for a planned community in Sutter County a few years back.Voters blocked it as I recall. Man that was a nasty fight on both sides.
15 posted on 07/29/2002 9:33:53 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
"You've got to be kidding!!!!"

Oh sure, they have a city ordinance forbidding negative vibes, silly!

16 posted on 07/29/2002 11:08:12 AM PDT by nimc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
bttt
17 posted on 07/29/2002 11:54:20 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: comwatch; Saundra Duffy; SierraWasp
Seems I've alread posted an article about this. It does mention the meeting on the 20th. I guess the vote will be taken on Sept. 17th so I'd like to have protester on the 20th but we should put the push on for a crowd on the 17th. Perhaps the modesto crowd would drive up for that one. I'd like to see this get bit and could be a great precursor to the Convoy rally on Sept 30th.
18 posted on 08/16/2002 12:18:19 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson