Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Bush Come to Shove
Weekly Standard | 11/25/02 | James Rosen

Posted on 11/18/2002 2:43:54 PM PST by Wphile

Trailing the Presient across America, the White House press corps logged tens of thousands of miles this election cycle, condemned to watch Bush deliver the same stump speech several times a day. Jaded and bored, we pounced on the gaffes and yawned at the platitudes. In light of the midterm eletions results, however, it is clear we were watching an exceptionally effective campaigner - as Max Cleland, Jean Carnahan, Bill McBride, and several other stunned victims, still reeling from defeat, can attest.

What made the president's campaign appearances work so well? Certainly it wasn't their setting. He gave most of his speeches at fund-raising or welcome rallies held in hangars at the Air Force bases where his plane touched down. Nor was it his delivery. Bush is famous for his stumbles. "There's an old saying in Tennessee," he told a Nashville audience on September 17, "I know it's in Texas, it's probably in Tennessee, that says, 'Fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again.'"

Part of the answer has to do with his speeches' content. Democrats may find it convenient to chalk up their reivals' successes to the way the White House played the war card. But the reality was more complicated. Bush talked about lots of issues, not just Iraq, and he chose his targets well. His rhetorical villains were hardly limited to terrorists and Saddam Hussein.

Trial lawyers caught nearly as much presidentital flak as al Qaeda, and on several different counts. At North Carolina's Charlotte Coliseum on October 24, Bush, championing medical malpractice liability reform, recounted the plight of a doctor who had relocated to the Mississippi Delta "to help people who couldn't help themselves with medicine." Unfortunately, the president explained, "the trial lawyers have made it so hard for this guy to practice compassionate medicine, he said, 'I've had it, I'm moving back home.'"

A week later, at West Virginia's Charleston Civic Center, Bush again blamed avaricious attorneys - this time for driving homebuilders out of business - as he called for terrorism insurance legislation that will "reward the hard hats and hardworking Americans, not America's trial lawyers." Even Bush's hit-or-miss laugh line - "The enemy must have thought we were so weak, so shallow, so self-absorbed, that all we would do after 9/11 is maybe file a lawsuit or two" - was an attack on trial lawyers.

At stop after stop, the president also promised to "make the tax cuts permanent," place strict constructionists on the bench, and revamp Medicare. These thrusts often drew applause equal to, or louder than, his calls for a Department of Homeland Security or regime change in Iraq - the only parts of the president's speech that his audiences had already been exposed to through Iraq-focused news coverage of his previous campaign stops.

But Bush's effectiveness also stemmed from the way he came across as a person. For one thing, he shows respect for his audiences - and for the news media - by starting his events on time or even early. In this, he's the anti-Clinton. He also cuts a neat, muscular figure and projects a sunny disposition. And his speechwriters don't overwrite. They keep his lines short and simple, eschewing soaring Sorensenian sentences in favor of truisms: "It's not the government's money, it's the people's money!"

Bush and his team also excel at tailoring their message to the political exigencies of the locale or host. A good example was their handling of the president's visit to Minnesota during the final week of Election 2002, soon after the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone, one of the Senate's most consistent liberals, and seven other people. Bush - whom Wellstone had criticized during the 2000 cmapaign for his "really vicious attack on John McCain" - put politics aside at the outset and told the crowd: "Paul Wellstone was respected by all who worked with him; he'll be missed by all who knew him." He acknowledged that his listeners were "in mourning." By the time the president returned to politicking, the audience of close to 20,000 roared its approval. The "dignity gap" between this rally and the much criticized Wellstone memorial was unmistakable.

Similarly, in Florida, where his brother, Gov. Jeb Bush, had been dogged by challenger Bill McBride's vow to cut class sizes in public schools - unaccompanied by any explanantion of how the cuts would be paid for - the president told a University of South Florida audience in Tampa: "We've got too many in the political process who just say things, just kind of float something out there and hope it sounds good, hope somebody bite on it, hope it convinces people, but have no intentions or capabilities of getting it done."

These moments illustrate another secret of Bush's effectiveness: He knows what not to say. Of former vice president Walter Mondale, Wellstone's replacement on the ballot and a revered figure in Minnesota politics, the president uttered not a word during his in-state appearance two days before the election. Likewise, at the Jeb Bush rally three days before the polls opened, the governor's brother stayed presidential by refraining from mentioning McBride's class-size plan directly, or even referring to McBride by name.

The same restraint was discernible in Bush's campaigning for one Republican who would lose, Sen. Tim Hutchinson, whose reelection prospects had been undercut by a messy divorce. At a Hutchinson rally in Bentonville, Arkansas, on election eve, Bush discreetly jettisoned his standard warmp-up lines extolling Candidate X as a "good man" who, like the president, had "married above himself."

It may be premature to crown George W. Bush the new Great Communicator. But respect for Bush's effectiveness - especially for his unique blend of Texan tact, directness, and humor - seems to be growing, even among White House correspondents.

This was evident at the president's valedictory news conference two days after the election. Relaxed and smiling, Bush allowed an unfriendly reporter a follow-up question, saying, "If the elections had gone a different way, I might not be so generous." He got a big laugh.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; campaign2002
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 11/18/2002 2:43:54 PM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; Miss Marple; mtngrl@vrwc; MJY1288; admiralsn; Republic; RoseofTexas; GUIDO; lawgirl; ...
Another great article from the Weekly Standard!
2 posted on 11/18/2002 2:45:32 PM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McLynnan; Carolinamom; twyn1; tamikamaria; SuziQ; Pippin; ReaganandDubyaForever; SevenofNine; ...
PING!
3 posted on 11/18/2002 2:47:17 PM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
I have a question- I have been reading Free Republic for sometime and I have a few things that confuse me-
What does "ping" mean?
What does "IMHO" mean?
What does "bump" mean?

I am not stupid I just don't know what these mean and I would really like to know. Thanks! Taryn
4 posted on 11/18/2002 2:50:19 PM PST by Sicvee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
At a Hutchinson rally in Bentonville, Arkansas, on election eve, Bush discreetly jettisoned his standard warmp-up lines extolling Candidate X as a "good man" who, like the president, had "married above himself."

Ah, well. I don't know whether to laugh or cry about Hutchinson. Now we're stuck with Pryor, and it may well be for the long term.

5 posted on 11/18/2002 2:50:48 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sicvee
What does "ping" mean? It means to call the attention of the people addressed to an article that may interest them.

What does "IMHO" mean? In my humble opinion. Standard net usage.

What does "bump" mean? It means giving your approval to the thread by adding to the number of replies.
6 posted on 11/18/2002 2:52:34 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sicvee
"Ping" just means you are alerting certain posters to a particular thread.

"IMHO" means "in my humble opinion."

"Bump" or sometimes "BTTT" is used to draw attention to the thread because each time someone responds, it shows up on latest posts.

Hope this helps, and welcome to FR. I didn't have a clue what anything meant either so don't sweat it.

7 posted on 11/18/2002 2:53:19 PM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Seems to me that Hutchinson probably got what he deserved. He should know better. Only democrats can pretend to be virtuous and then dump their wife for a trophy wife and get away with it. Republicans can't do that.

Still, having to swallow the Pryor pill is a bit tough to do!

8 posted on 11/18/2002 2:55:17 PM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Character matters! (Something the Democrats will never understand.)
9 posted on 11/18/2002 2:55:21 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Thank you so much! I have been wondering for a while so today I thought I would ask. Have a great night!
10 posted on 11/18/2002 3:01:33 PM PST by Sicvee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Thud
ping
11 posted on 11/18/2002 3:04:00 PM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing; Admin Moderator
Whoops! I just noticed I typed the headline wrong. It should read "When Bush Came to Shove" instead of "When Bush Come to Shove".

Admin Mod...can you fix that?

12 posted on 11/18/2002 3:05:36 PM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Leave it ...Bush did come to shove! Shove a real message out there, one that America has been longing to here!
13 posted on 11/18/2002 3:19:37 PM PST by D. Miles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Is the James Rosen who wrote this the same James Rosen who is a Fox News Channcel White House correspondent?
14 posted on 11/18/2002 3:20:00 PM PST by jgdiamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jgdiamond
He's the James Rosen on Fox,


15 posted on 11/18/2002 3:36:00 PM PST by Toidylop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
But respect for Bush's effectiveness - especially for his unique blend of Texan tact, directness, and humor - seems to be growing, even among White House correspondents.

Most of them hide any respectful feelings quite well, especially the troll "unfriendly repoter" mentioned at the end.

Great article! Thanks for posting it ..... :-)

16 posted on 11/18/2002 3:54:38 PM PST by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Thanks for the ping. Its good to see that some in the press are beginning to "get" this President. Who knows, before long they might catch up with the rest of America...... Naaaaah.
17 posted on 11/18/2002 3:59:14 PM PST by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jgdiamond
I think it is the same James Rosen.
18 posted on 11/18/2002 4:07:56 PM PST by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kayak
Yeah, I laughed out loud at the one. Helen Thomas unfriendly? YES. A reporter? Maybe when Lincoln was shot.
19 posted on 11/18/2002 4:08:23 PM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Jaded and bored, we pounced on the gaffes and yawned at the platitudes.

Hard to believe anyone is even mentioning verbal gaffes after what this President has already done for this country!

Oh, well......at least they're beginning to figure things out.

And, oh yes...I can vouch for the fact that he cuts a 'neat, muscular' figure! One might even say, dashing! :o)

20 posted on 11/18/2002 4:12:53 PM PST by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson