Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Nominates Democratic to FEC
Aberdeen American News/ AP ^ | 11-19-02 | SHARON THEIMER (AP)

Posted on 11/19/2002 5:46:01 PM PST by jwalburg

WASHINGTON- President Bush on Tuesday nominated Democratic attorney Ellen Weintraub to serve on the Federal Election Commission, a move sought by sponsors of the nation's new campaign finance law.

Weintraub is an attorney with the Perkins Coie law firm in Washington, where her clients have included the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and its House counterpart.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and other proponents of the new law want Weintraub to replace Democratic Commissioner Karl Sandstrom, whose term expired more than a year ago.

Sandstrom has joined three Republican commissioners on several controversial 4-2 votes in recent months spelling out how the FEC will enforce new campaign finance restrictions.

The sponsors say those decisions opened loopholes; Sandstrom and the three Republicans contend they are simply exercising the latitude Congress gave them to interpret the law and trying to prevent the new rules from going further than Congress intended.

The law, which took effect Nov. 6, prohibits national party committees from raising "soft money" - unlimited contributions from businesses, unions and others - and imposes new restrictions on interest group political ads close to elections, among other changes.

The nomination paves the way for Bush to appoint Weintraub to the commission after Congress goes home for the year. McCain has said Bush promised to place Weintraub on the commission through a recess appointment, which allows the president to put his nominees in their jobs without Senate confirmation proceedings.

Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., recommended Weintraub for the FEC spot last May.

When weeks passed with no White House action, McCain threatened to block various Bush nominees. He stopped after the administration assured him in July that Bush would name Weintraub to the FEC this fall.

The commission consists of three Republicans and three Democrats.

Weintraub would be the third woman commissioner since the FEC's creation in 1975, and the only woman on its current panel.

ON THE NET Federal Election Commission: http://www.fec.gov/


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; daschle; elections; fec; weintraub
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., recommended Weintraub for the FEC spot last May.

This is a bad sign.

1 posted on 11/19/2002 5:46:01 PM PST by jwalburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Bush hates free speech and has appointed a fellow hater to make sure that our voice is squashed in the political process. There is no way in hell I am voting for this idiot again.
2 posted on 11/19/2002 5:56:25 PM PST by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Miss Marple; PhiKapMom; Wait4Truth
fyi......
3 posted on 11/19/2002 5:58:50 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Satadru; deport
Well, hold on a second... I'm not on the Bush bandwagon by any means, but this article fails to mention that Daschle was entitled to this appointment. Even Slick would appoint Lott's FEC picks. The FEC is evenly divided by party and each side gets to make their own picks. Bush's "appointment" was merely ministerial in nature.
4 posted on 11/19/2002 6:02:27 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
Oh, get a life, dude! Bush doesn't "hate free speech." He just has this maddening tendency to be generous to his enemies - namely McCain - when he's at the peak of his momentum and popularity and absolutely doesn't have to.

And consider this. Noisemakers like you and me have been faulting his tactical judgment for 2 years now and what have they gotten us? A GOP sweep!

5 posted on 11/19/2002 6:02:27 PM PST by winin2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: winin2000
OK. There is a procedural point to this that each party gets their own nominees. I see the point. But, what about independents? In any election, anywhere between 5-8% vote a third party. We need at least one person who is independent to be on the FEC.
6 posted on 11/19/2002 6:05:38 PM PST by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
Your remarks are totally irrelevant, since there is absolutely NO truth to them.
7 posted on 11/19/2002 6:06:31 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Ssshhhhhhh... lol. Let them rant awhile.

8 posted on 11/19/2002 6:06:42 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Ssshhhhhhh... lol. Let them rant awhile.

9 posted on 11/19/2002 6:06:42 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: winin2000
What a nice remark you just made!
10 posted on 11/19/2002 6:07:21 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: deport
hiccupping along.....
11 posted on 11/19/2002 6:07:31 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
I just wanted to personally thank President Bush for signing Campaign Finance Reform into being and therefore making the voice of the 4th estate the resounding voice before election times, whilst eroding, if not seriously degrading, our 1st Amendment rights to freedom of speech...< /sarcasm >
12 posted on 11/19/2002 6:08:03 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

13 posted on 11/19/2002 6:13:40 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
In any election, anywhere between 5-8% vote a third party. We need at least one person who is independent to be on the FEC.

Well, when you can elect a mongrel independent to the presidency, then he/she/it can appoint somebody to the FEC.

14 posted on 11/19/2002 6:16:09 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Since he has to be confirmed by the Senate, maybe they will vote no. As mentioned, this is the guy McCain wanted and threatened Bush with. A no vote would be great.
15 posted on 11/19/2002 6:37:39 PM PST by Angel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
The law calls for 2 democrats and 2 Republicans on the commission. One of the Democrats was very DINO and he got to serve as long as Bush did not appoint his replacement. He votes with the Republicans in all the cases. That got some Democrats in trouble and fined.

Bush waited until after the 2002 election to appoint the Democrat that was supposed to judge the 2002 election. His term was supposed to start about a year ago. The democrats have been screaming about this for months. GASP.GASP.

It was just hardball politics. It is trading stock. You won't confirm my judge and I won't appoint your FEC guy. I keep the Dino guy in that votes for me. It is played all the time. Sometimes even within your own party. Senator Proxmier was always holding up Reagan's appointments for ransom.

There is an old saying that one should never watch sausage or laws being made. Sausage is made by cleaning the pig sh*t out of a pig's intestine and filling it with a combination of pork meat and fat. Some say it tastes really good. I will leave it up to others to say why you should not watch laws being made.

16 posted on 11/19/2002 6:38:30 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Some/most of the lawyers on the Bush team during the 2000 general election in Florida were Democrats.
17 posted on 11/19/2002 6:41:47 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
So I guess it looks official: "Democratic" has replace "Democrat." The media goes along as if it always were. Slip it in there and don't discuss the real reason the Dems want to change another word, this one being the name of their part (or an adjective describing a member). The real reason of course is that the name "Democrat" has become dirty. So they use "Democratic" now.
18 posted on 11/19/2002 6:44:11 PM PST by bluefish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Well, when you can elect a mongrel independent to the presidency, then he/she/it can appoint somebody to the FEC.

NO the law requires half Republicans and half Democrats. A president may not appoint an independent. This appointment mandated a Democrat. Bush could only appoint a Democrat to this seat.

Independents have to elect a house majority and a senate majority and a president to get it done. This is nation whose laws have been written by the two parties for over 142 years. There is just one thing they agree on. Make it impossible for a third party to succeed.

For those who don't like Democrats or Republicans their is only way to change things. They have to get into one of the two parties and take it over. The third party people are just idiots. It is not just a stacked deck against them, they are dealt zero cards.

The FEC and the committees in the congress that have control of members always have an equal number of democrats and Republicans. When Bonier was going after Newt that house committee had an equal number of Republicans and Democrats even though all other committees had a majority of Republicans.

Third party people are just grossly ignorant of this nation and its laws. If an independent did get to be president the republicans and democrats would both gang up on him. And they can't use a personality like a Perot to make it with out wining the house. But they can't win the senate in one election. It would very likely take 6 years.

The only time a third party could succeed is when both of the major parties are in agreement on very very important issues and majority of Americans disagree with both major parties on those issues. Then and only then could a third party gain control.

The progressive party under LaFolette got some support in the 1920's. But as they started to be a factor, the Democrats under FDR adopted their views and the progressives died.

None of the progressive leadership ever had any clout except V.P. Wallace. FDR dumped him as VP for Truman in 44.

19 posted on 11/19/2002 6:54:06 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
Bush hates free speech and has appointed a fellow hater to make sure that our voice is squashed in the political process. There is no way in hell I am voting for this idiot again.

Get a life. The political parties have to be represented on the FEC equally - by law.

As for idiots, yes, you qualify.

20 posted on 11/19/2002 6:57:27 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson