Skip to comments.
Senate energy bill faces host of Democratic amendments
Washington Times ^
| 7/29/03
| James G. Lakely
Posted on 07/28/2003 10:43:14 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:05:42 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Republicans' desire to pass a comprehensive energy bill in the Senate by the end of the week is imperiled by as many as 100 amendments offered by Democrats, the stickiest of which tighten fuel-efficiency requirements for automobiles and address global warming.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: energy; energylist
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Sen. Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico, ranking Democrat on the energy panel, will offer an amendment as early as today that would require utilities to generate at least 10 percent of their electricity from renewable sources, such as wind, by 2020. This amendment is a good idea, it helps cut our dependence on non-renewaable energy sources while creating an incentive for further technology research.
2
posted on
07/28/2003 10:51:44 PM PDT
by
FreeLibertarian
(You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
What ever happened to nuclear energy?
3
posted on
07/28/2003 10:51:52 PM PDT
by
Rudder
To: FreeLibertarian
But but....didn't the democrats block installation of an off shore wind farm that would block their view.....?
4
posted on
07/28/2003 11:14:27 PM PDT
by
spokeshave
(against albore the wood, rats and fogs)
To: spokeshave
I'm not sure what you're refering to but here in New Mexico a new wind farm is being brought on-line in the next month that will supply enough power for approximately 25% of the states current consumption. No one is complaining.
I expect within 10 years New Mexico will be capable of supplying 100% of its own needs plus exporting power to other states from wind power alone and that's only the beginning..
5
posted on
07/28/2003 11:25:31 PM PDT
by
FreeLibertarian
(You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
To: FreeLibertarian
Do you have any documentation on that 25%?
To: Ben Ficklin
7
posted on
07/29/2003 3:36:06 AM PDT
by
FreeLibertarian
(You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
To: *Energy_List; Ernest_at_the_Beach
To: FreeLibertarian
This amendment is a good idea, it helps cut our dependence on non-renewaable energy sources This amendment is a bad idea, it burdens utilities with a mandate to produce electricity from a costly, unproven source.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
10
posted on
07/29/2003 9:58:06 AM PDT
by
FreeLibertarian
(You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson