I congratulate the Mississippi Supreme Court for its respect for life and the mother's right to carry her child to birth. Every state should adopt similar legal positions. Roe v. Wade tragically granted a right to kill pre-born children to mothers. It did not grant the same right to everyone, irrespective of a mother's consent.
Pro-abortion people will go to any length to defend a mother's right to kill her pre-born children, including the defense of everyone's right to kill pre-born children. If you defend a non-penalty status for the wrongful death of pre-born children, you are in effect defending a universal right to kill pre-born children, unlimited by a mother's consent.
To: Got a right to Life? . . Huh?
Sondra Goldschein of the ACLU condemned the decision saying "anytime the fetus is recognizable as a person it chips away at the foundation of Roe."That's right Sondra! It sure does!
2 posted on
08/22/2003 11:53:54 AM PDT by
wideawake
(God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
To: Got a right to Life? . . Huh?
Sondra Goldschein of the ACLU condemned the decision saying "anytime the fetus is recognizable as a person it chips away at the foundation of Roe." Waitaminnit Sondra, I thought you wanted the 'fetus' to be a person/nonperson at the whim of the mother. Well she wanted it to be a person. So what's your problem? Are you dictating to mothers? Is that truly living up to your "pro CHOICE" claims gal? Is it?
To: Got a right to Life? . . Huh?; wideawake
Headed to the SCOTUS no doubt,chip,chip,chip...
4 posted on
08/22/2003 11:57:00 AM PDT by
mdittmar
To: Tabitha Soren
Paging Tabitha, paging Tabitha
To: Got a right to Life? . . Huh?
The Mississippi Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that an unborn child is a person... Justice Jim Smith, writing for the court, said the decision has no impact on the status of legal abortions in the state.
Of course...this stems from the "People have the right to rip persons limb from limb" exception in the Federal Code.
To: Got a right to Life? . . Huh?
Sondra Goldschein of the ACLU condemned the decision saying "anytime the fetus is recognizable as a person it chips away at the foundation of Roe."SHE is a good case for believing in retroactive abortions !
7 posted on
08/22/2003 12:28:13 PM PDT by
smokeyb
To: Got a right to Life? . . Huh?
Understand that I support the ruling.
However, we must NOT forget the law of unintended consequences. Im sure that this ruling will likely result in OB insurance increasing.
8 posted on
08/22/2003 1:19:22 PM PDT by
taxcontrol
(People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
To: Got a right to Life? . . Huh?
Thwap!
USSC is going to have some very hysterical Justices on their hands.
I call three retirements after next election.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson