Skip to comments.
Fool Me Twice: Saddam Hussein continues to hoodwink the Western media
NRO ^
| 10.3.2003
| Andrew Apostolou
Posted on 10/03/2003 2:00:20 PM PDT by Mr. Buzzcut
On the face of it, Friday morning's crop of headlines looks pretty good for Saddam Hussein. If he could read them from his current residence, likely to be a sewer in Tikrit, he might think that he has again conned much of the American media with the same ease that he mislead Hans Blix. He would be thrilled to read that many have decided that the U.S. arms investigator, David Kay, who heads up the Iraq Survey Group, has drawn a blank in his search for Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)...
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: excerptmadness; iraq; kay; media; saddam; saddambush; wmd
Velly intellesting ...
To: All
Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
10/03/2003 2:01:02 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Mr. Buzzcut
"Saddam's regime was not in compliance with its U.N. obligations."
National Review is a liberal magazine, now?
Conservatives generally don't consider violations of UN Resolutions worth a single American life.
3
posted on
10/03/2003 2:06:28 PM PDT
by
JohnGalt
("the constitution as it is, the union as it was")
To: JohnGalt
4
posted on
10/03/2003 2:09:17 PM PDT
by
JohnGalt
("the constitution as it is, the union as it was")
To: Mr. Buzzcut
Kay has validated the reason for going to war: Saddam's regime was not in compliance with its U.N. obligations.Now that's funny. That is almost as funny as when they say that Bush must be telling the truth about "WMD" because that great pillar of honesty, Bill Clinton, agrees with him.
5
posted on
10/03/2003 2:17:09 PM PDT
by
alpowolf
To: JohnGalt
"National Review is a liberal magazine, now?"
How so, I don't think that AR would agree with Leonard today.
Most media is NWO socialist, especially NR and its CFR annointed chairman.
By the way, if things don't work out for me in central Alabama after moving from Detroit, how do I get to your gulch?
6
posted on
10/03/2003 2:39:19 PM PDT
by
ido_now
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson