[steve50]

The MOST cost-effective, total cost/all costs paid, source of biomass would, without doubt, be the sundry liberal/Marxist/dirtbag lefties and their children. Why wouldn't a conservative ''like'' this source?

Please don't bother posting such idiocy to me.

[SAJ]

Can't add, eh?

Any given politico-economic philosophy carries with it consequences, and these consequences are cumulative over time. When I used the phrase ''all costs paid'', it meant ''ALL costs paid'', economic, social, and political, not, simplistically, just the cost of converting these folks' body mass into crackable hydrocarbons.

Would you deny, just offhand, that there is and always has been a surplus of those who would confiscate, either arbitrarily or under colour of ''law'', the property of their fellow citizens?

Idiocy, is it? The idiocy is that folks such as you have let these slime proceed as far as they have done.