That is not what I said at all. I didnt say all that. I wrote clearly exactly and precisely what I wrote.
To propose multiple fulfillments (with no specific number of fulfillments) is to propose Idealism. There is no way to know what “the end” actually is. How do we know there isn’t yet another more profound fulfillment at some point in the future? Idealism in eschatology is a bad idea. Logically, it’s a non sequitur. It’s not a bad idea in ethics, since the point of the NT is to learn principles that can be applied to other eras. But, they’re not the same thing.