[from occupied ga]

It seems obvious to me that she wrote it an a somewhat controversial manner to get a reaction. The main point of her article that the feds are using the attack of 9/11 to spread their unconstitutional powers further is obvious to all except to most unaware.

[billbears]

I would like to thank you for an excellent post. It seems after reading the reponses, that it might have struck a discordant note with the subjects to the EMPIRE. How dare we question what Congress is doing!! What? Should we start a schedule three times a day bowing to the east, the 'holy' city of Washington? They already take over 40% of my money. Mindless sheep have their President now and how dare we question him!! I honestly used to be a big GWB supporter, but from the statements and actions lately all I've seen is a moral version of Klintoon. Give up your liberties and rights all in the name of 'safety'!!

From deep in the EMPIRE,

Subject to the STATE,

[AndyJackson]

The main point of her article that the feds are using the attack of 9/11 to spread their unconstitutional powers further is obvious to all except to most unaware.

That is a very good subject on which to write an article, but that is not what Ms de Coster wrote or wrote about. What she wrote was a "translation" of Mr. Bush's speech. Since she appears to be using a different dictionary from the rest of us, some explanation is in order. She gave us none. Other than a supposed translation, she wrote about nothing.

[Verax]

Bump!