J'Accuse

Lew Rockwell ^ | 12/23/01 | Michael Peirce

[Ada Coddington]

A few more unpleasant truths, freepers.

[Catspaw]

More drivel from lewrockwell, once again wasting JimRob's bandwith.

[Dane]

This article should be renamed,

J'Schizophrenic.

[em2vn]

I read lewrockwell.com for an extended period of time, however, I began to see a total lack of objectivity in the articles.Your post serves as a excellent example of such a lack of objectivity. You make the charges but fail to provide any evidence to support your claims. For the most part I find lewrockwell.com to be on a par with Churck Harder and his For The People radio show. There is shock radio for the ratings and now their is shock internet site for the hits. This is from one who was fighting communism while you were still in diapers.

[Ada Coddington]

I read lewrockwell.com for an extended period of time, however, I began to see a total lack of objectivity in the articles.

Lewrockwell, like freerepublic, is an opinion site not a news site. Neither place intends to be objective.

[LonePalm]

You forgot the Barf Alert and Lew Rockwell warnings.

Merry Christmas Anyway!

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LoanPalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

[serinde]

Thanks for posting this. I have really been surprised at the bashing lewrockwell.com has taken from Freepers the last several weeks.

I was very glad when Bush got elected, but seeing our rights deteriorate ever faster under his administration has concerned me enormously. Yet lately, any comments or criticism about this has been called very nasty names.

Any reduction of rights, by any authority or administration should be noticed and questioned and an accounting called for. Thanks to lewrockwell.com for doing this, and shame on all the Freepers that think everything is now hunky-dory in our country.

[Catspaw]

Apparently, you post this trash because you want lewrockwell to get more hits because they're unable to generate the hits themselves. It's Freeper-envy.

Perhaps at some point, libertarians will be able to organize themselves long enough to start their own forum. Until then, conservatives will have to put up with their dreck being posted here.

[bulldog905]

There are a lot of points Mr. Pierce makes which I agree with.(And some I don't).

But I find it utter hyprocisy to buy any self-proclaimed "libertarian" type's concern for national security.

They are, after all, for open borders.

[CommiesOut]

Neokommies in America?
Surprise, surprise.

[RippleFire]

If LewRockwell.com had a life of its own, they would not always be over on FreeRepublic trying to find an audience.

[capt. norm]

I don't really know why I do it but I systematically ignore all Lew Rockwell posts. Every now and again I check one out and am always disappointed.

I have always assumed that they "mini-spam" FreeRepulic to get publicity and web-site hits. If they were to disappear tomorrow, I would not miss them in the least.

[Ada Coddington]

But I find it utter hyprocisy to buy any self-proclaimed "libertarian" type's concern for national security. They are, after all, for open borders.

Not the paleo-libs.

[Ada Coddington]

Apparently, you post this trash because you want lewrockwell to get more hits because they're unable to generate the hits themselves

No, I post because they have something to say which at least some freepers might want to hear.

I understand they attract plenty of hits on their own.

[Ada Coddington]

Thanks for posting this. I have really been surprised at the bashing lewrockwell.com has taken from Freepers the last several weeks.

The bashing is mostly by I consider fear-biters. They are terrified of freedom.

[Ada Coddington]

If LewRockwell.com had a life of its own, they would not always be over on FreeRepublic trying to find an audience.

Lew has interesting columnists but no discussion ability. IMO its a symbiotic relationship.

[ThreeOfSeven]

Our schools have drugged over half, yes that’s half, of the male children that attend.

That's quite an assertion.

[Catspaw]

No, I post because they have something to say which at least some freepers might want to hear.

No, you're posting this because you think that everyone on Freerepublic should have the same mindset as Peirce. What enriches Freerepublic is the diversity of opinion. What I resent is being told how to think by someone who has been richly and deservedly criticized on FR.

[Catspaw]

That's quite an assertion.

With no substantiation, no source.

[Beenliedto]

J'Schizophrenic

Yes, you are.