There are a lot of points Mr. Pierce makes which I agree with.(And some I don't).
But I find it utter hyprocisy to buy any self-proclaimed "libertarian" type's concern for national security.
They are, after all, for open borders.
Michael Pierce is not for open borders. Most paleolibertarians of the LewRockwell.com ilk are not. They realize that the immigration patterns that have prevailed since 1965 have had the effect of growing government, and they realize the "metamarket" necessary for capitalism.