Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
Yep, the rational choice is to get rid of RFG altogether. Simply banning MTBE, which makes up a significant portion of an actual gallon of gasoline, will cause a gasoline shortage of an unacceptable magnitude.

No shortage should occur and here's why. In terms of enegy content, MTBE is close to zero. When the original tests were done, measurements were done related to pollutants per gallon of gasoline-- not pollutants per mile driven. In fact, the mileage for MTBE gas in CA is lower than federal reformulated gas, so supply would not be a problem if we switched to federal reformulatd gas.

But wait, it gets better. To comply with federal legislation (Clean air act) we must use either MTBE or ethanol, which is not produced here in CA. And their is no pipeline to get it here.

For more info on MTBE (Proven carcinogen) check link:

www.pushback.com/

15 posted on 03/15/2002 6:45:16 PM PST by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: quimby; 1Old Pro; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; a_federalist; abner; aculeus; alaskanfan; alloysteel...
"...or ethanol, which is not produced here in CA."

But there is no reason that we can't produce it here. - Just the cannery waste alone, which is now being dumped into the sewers, would produce more than three times as much ethyl as we need (actually we don't need any, but that's another story) for motor fuels.

It's time for the hype to stop.

20 posted on 03/15/2002 8:25:17 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson