Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomPoster
"If that is not the case, I apologize, but as of right now, vague assertions of "more than 100% electrically efficient" due to "high temp electrolyzers" don't mean much to me, and I suspect others as well. And I'll hang with you on as much thermodynamics/heat transfer/fluid mechanics/energy system analysis (technical and economic) as you care to discuss...."

Simple--the extra energy needed (over and above electric current) comes from thermal energy. Think of it as a combined catalytic cracker/electrolysis cell without the side reactions of a full catalytic cracking process. This example was intended to point out that Boris's assertion that "...electrolysis cells are 70% efficient, tops.." was baloney. In fact, even current technology electrolysis cells AT LOW LOADS are in the mid-90% efficency region, but that drops off as the load is increased--and probably DOES drop to Boris's 70% efficiency at full production rates.

I spent years working for a chemical company that produced megatons of chlorine per year by electrolysis, so I am "somewhat" familiar with industrial-scale electrolysis. It gets REAL interesting working around a 10 kiloamp DC electric field.

76 posted on 03/26/2002 3:45:19 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
I visited Alcoa's bauxite smelters while in college - don't take anything with a mag stripe with you, and if you hold out your keys, they align with the magnetic field. Similar stuff, verrrryy interesting.
79 posted on 03/26/2002 5:30:09 PM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson