[detsaoT]

"Funding of medical abortions is guaranteed under the California Constitution."

I have searched the California Constitution on various keywords, as well as manually perusing the provisions within, and I am unable to find a single phrase that supports this argument. Does anyone know what the hell this guy is talking about?

(If this is true, it's yet another reason why I will never recommend that any Conservative move there; if false, then it's not like I really needed another reason, but it certainly would seem to indicate a vast misunderstanding by the population of California with respect to the contents of their Constitution...)

:) ttt

[detsaoT]

Here's a bump. My apologies for being a day late and a dollar short re: this article. It passed under my radar until I remembered reading it in the paper. I hope someone can shed some light on my concern/question...

:) ttt

[Carry_Okie]

I have searched the California Constitution on various keywords, as well as manually perusing the provisions within, and I am unable to find a single phrase that supports this argument. Does anyone know what the hell this guy is talking about?

Are you ready? Do you remember when Californians passed a constitutional amendment protecting "Privacy"?

That was it. A right to unlimited abortion is considered to be "privacy" under this provision. Meanwhile, the State bureaucrats can sneak onto your land, take samples and photographs, fine and you without recourse, they can beat on your door and examine your kids, they can search your car without a warrant. They don't call that privacy.

Orwellian, isn't it?