Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Grampa Dave; sasquatch
Despite criticism from the federal government and his own campaign pledge four years ago, Gov. Gray Davis has done little to strengthen logging restrictions around the state's streams and creeks, pushing Northern California's salmon and steelhead trout closer to extinction.

Bull-oney! The coho salmon rules that the Davis appointed Board implimented in July of 2000, and have extended every year since, placed severe regulatory restrictions on logging near fish bearing streams. As stated at the end of the article: The rules create 150-foot buffers on each side of fish-bearing streams. Loggers are required to leave 85 percent of the canopy within 75 feet of the stream and 65 percent of the canopy in the remaining part of the buffer.

These rules severely damaged the ability of small landowners to harvest their own land here in Kali. This was not enough for the enviros however, because the big companies still are logging their own company lands.

Since taking office, however, he has raised about $336,000 from timber companies while appointing a majority of pro-industry members to the Board of Forestry who have opposed the tough restrictions that federal officials and environmentalists say are needed to restore Northern California's wilderness.

See, it's not about saving the fish; it's about implimenting the wildlands project in Northern California.

I could go on ripping this article apart because it is down right mis-leading and innacurate. The question I have is: Why is the liberal San Francisco Chronicle ripping into their golden boy Davis?

3 posted on 03/31/2002 9:37:50 AM PST by forester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: forester
Why is the liberal San Francisco Chronicle ripping into their golden boy Davis?

Its just a ploy to get the issue before the voters. They will equate Simon with the devil and give Davis a passing grade when the election is near.

I too have observed very high regulatory control in riperian zones around rivers on private land. They regulated our logging and kept us out of river zones. What else could they do except plant spotted owls in the forest?

5 posted on 03/31/2002 10:17:47 AM PST by KC_for_Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: forester;Carry_Okie;Grampa Dave;Marsh2;Iconoclast2;IssaquahKing;farmfriend;ScottInSacto...
Because... It's gonna be much easier to intimidate what they think is an inexperienced Governor Simon than one of their own who knows the whole thing is a SHAKEDOWN from the get-go, anyway!

Just look back at how they intimidated George Herbert Walker Bush! They had more fun writing stories to make him embarrassed and supporting all the "romantic activists" escapades. They did a huge amount of it to Pete Wilson and his Resources Agency head, Dougie Wheeler who fancied himself an EnvironMentalCase.

These guys all know where the votes and the money are!!! It's in the dang blue zones with all the blue nosed citified slickers who can only fanticize about living in the rural areas and living off the land by actually caring for it!

They come out here for a few weekends and one vacation per year and ski, raft, kayak, taste some wine, check out a dude ranch, check out the historical stuff, do a little crafting and antiquing... then go back to their traffic choked, crime riddled metro-money makeing enterprise and send their tax deductible contributions to THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, THE AMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY, THE SIERRA CLUB, FRIENDS OF THE RIVER, DUCKS UNLIMITED, THE GREAT VALLEY CENTER, THE SIERRA NEVADA ALLIANCE, etc., etc., etc., ad nauseum, ad infinitium...

You know what happens to that money. They refer to it in their grant writing applications to the Feds as a "strong show of support for public money to be used in a PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP" between them and the totally infiltrated Federal/State Agency that is "Empire Building" at full TILT by "Rural Cleansing!!!"

13 posted on 03/31/2002 6:41:20 PM PST by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: forester
Why is the liberal San Francisco Chronicle ripping into their golden boy Davis?

Exactly my first thought. To me, this means that the RATS know Davis is doomed and are leaving his sinking ship! Wooo-hooooo!

21 posted on 04/02/2002 1:45:10 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: forester
The question I have is: Why is the liberal San Francisco Chronicle
ripping into their golden boy Davis?


It gives him a free venue to respond. They'll have to publish it to be 'fair'.
This is how the new campaign finance reform will used by the radical left wing media.
24 posted on 04/04/2002 7:25:25 AM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson