Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daniel Weintraub: Do voters care that Davis mixes politics, business?
Sacramento Bee ^ | 5/7/02 | Daniel Weintraub

Posted on 05/07/2002 10:21:58 AM PDT by randita

Daniel Weintraub: Do voters care that Davis mixes politics, business?

By Daniel Weintraub -- Bee Columnist

Published 2:15 a.m. PDT Tuesday, May 7, 2002

As long as Gov. Gray Davis has been in politics, he has been known for the joy he takes in separating campaign donors from their money. What most politicians do with reluctance, Davis, by all accounts, does with relish. His ability to ask for $1 million with a straight face has made him the most successful fund-raiser in the history of California politics.

The voters haven't seemed to mind. Davis' money-grubbing, a constant topic of conversation among Capitol insiders, hasn't stopped him from rolling up big victories even as the public has been crying out for campaign finance reform.

All of that might be about to change.

The Davis operation has just been caught in a transaction that, if it wasn't criminal, was at least criminally dumb. It could be the kind of juicy story that finally leads voters to sit up and take notice of the governor's habit of mixing campaign money and public policy to an unseemly degree.

Davis a year ago accepted a $25,000 campaign contribution from Oracle Corp. just days after the state and the computer software company signed a $95 million contract that the state auditor has since concluded was a terrible deal for the government.

The state thought it was saving money by getting a volume discount. Instead, it bought far more software than needed at prices that were no bargain. The whole thing, the auditor says, could cost taxpayers $41 million more than if there had been no deal at all.

And the Oracle donation, it turns out, was not given through normal channels from the company's headquarters to the governor's campaign committee in Los Angeles. Instead, a company lobbyist handed the check to Davis' e-government director in a Sacramento bar.

The contribution was perfectly legal as long as there was no quid pro quo, no agreement that the company was giving the money in exchange for the contract. But it smells awful. And most voters, put on a jury and asked to judge such conduct, would undoubtedly vote to convict, whatever the law might say.

Davis has suspended one official responsible for the contract and forced out two others, including Arun Baheti, the man who accepted the campaign contribution. The governor's aides are working furiously to distance Davis from the decision. But even if they somehow prove a negative -- that Davis knew nothing -- the Oracle case has opened a window on the governor's world that will not be easily closed.

This is a man who is known to keep lists, to keep track of friend and foe, of those who have helped him and those who have not. It is common knowledge among lobbyists that an individual or group that wants to meet with Davis can most easily secure an audience by ponying up $100,000 to his campaign committee.

Running for governor of California is no cheap task. It takes millions. But Davis, more than most politicians, leaves himself open to suspicion about his motives because he demonstrates so few core beliefs. And he has a curious habit, as he did in the Oracle case, of taking money from interest groups his administration has just helped or is in a position to assist.

In 1999, for instance, Davis attended a fund-raiser with health care lobbyists even as he was negotiating a plan to overhaul the way the state regulates managed care. Consumer advocates criticized the final deal as tilted toward the industry.

Around the same time he went to a reception hosted by the timber industry as his Department of Forestry was unveiling new logging regulations. He took about $75,000 from the ski industry and then exempted the resorts from paying overtime to seasonal workers. He received $130,000 from the Rite Aid corporation before his administration cancelled television ads criticizing the company for selling tobacco in its pharmacy stores. And earlier this year, he got $250,000 from the state prison guards union only weeks after signing off on a contract that will give the guards raises of more than 30 percent over the next five years.

Even when Davis does the right thing, his aggressive fund-raising tactics make his motives appear suspect. The governor, for example, has wisely vowed to veto a bill sponsored by the California Teachers Association to make education standards, curriculum and textbook selection the subject of union negotiations.

But now come published reports that before making that announcement, Davis twice asked the union's president for a $1 million donation and was rebuffed. Would his position on the bill have been the same if the union had come through with the money? That seems unlikely.

Davis has defended his relentless search for the dollar by saying, correctly, that he must raise a ton of money to have a chance against a wealthy opponent, Republican businessman Bill Simon. The governor has tried to make Simon's millions an issue.

But if he is not careful, Davis might leave voters thinking that they would rather have a governor who can spend his own money to get elected than one who sees every issue before his government as a chance to build the balance in his campaign fund.

The Bee's Daniel Weintraub can be reached at (916) 321-1914 or at dweintraub@sacbee.com .


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2002election; ca; calgov2002; davis; fundraising; oracle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: gubamyster
scate = skate
21 posted on 05/07/2002 12:45:01 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Well, I apologize for echoing the other comments, but until the liberal rags demand that he NOT run for G'vnor, or that he resign, or until they start demanding a criminal grand jury investigation with the goal of convicting and imprisoning all involved, including the G'vnor, then I can't take the rags and their scum reporters seriously. These slimeballs will still endorse him and vote for him.
22 posted on 05/07/2002 12:50:45 PM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Argus
good for you! Y'know, optimism is so unhealthy.
23 posted on 05/07/2002 12:53:28 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
I'm plenty optimistic about a lot of things, just not about leftist politics in California. As much as I'd like it to be different, I know for a certainty that Simon will not beat Davis in the election. It's like, I hope for filet mignon for dinner, but I know I'm having hamburger.
24 posted on 05/07/2002 2:08:01 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: all
We interrupt this thread with a news bulletin. The mail box bomber may have been seen in Utah. That is very close to Kaliland by I80 with basically no speedlimit.

Here is a photo of this deranged terrorist:

Go to this link for more up todate data: (link)

Stay alert and safe. Gray Davis and his band are bad enough to be roaming on our streets!

25 posted on 05/07/2002 3:40:51 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Watch them tear apart Davis in a feeding frenzy.

They can tear him apart with impunity now because he's beating Simon by double digits in the polls. If Simon ever gets close, you will see a media lovefest for Davis like you've never seen before. They don't like Davis, but they don't like Simon even more.

26 posted on 05/07/2002 5:20:30 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Ohhhh! I certainly hope so!!
27 posted on 05/07/2002 7:03:31 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Perhaps California is truly catching on to the fact that they elected a sleazeball.

This is still the same state that voted for impeached ex-President Clinton twice, elected and reelected Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, elected and reelected Alan Cranston, etc. etc. Apparently we like sleazeballs a lot.

28 posted on 05/07/2002 7:06:56 PM PDT by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: randita
But if he is not careful, Davis might leave voters thinking that they would rather have a governor who can spend his own money to get elected than one who sees every issue before his government as a chance to build the balance in his campaign fund.

Hah! The idiot who wrote this obviously has no clue about California.

29 posted on 05/07/2002 7:08:26 PM PDT by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLOTownConservative
San Luis Obispo bump.
30 posted on 05/07/2002 7:12:46 PM PDT by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
Yep, that's my bet too.

I hope they surprise me (my expectations are very low).

I'm sure Davis is already putting his people in place for a "properly tuned" election count this November as well...

31 posted on 05/08/2002 5:03:50 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: altair
I voted against all of them...
32 posted on 05/08/2002 5:07:52 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: altair
Hey!

I'm about 20 miles north of SLO.

33 posted on 05/08/2002 5:08:28 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Gophack; TheAngryClam; BibChr; Brian Allen ; CalGov2002; Brad's Gramma; Dan from Michigan...
But if he is not careful, Davis might leave voters thinking that they would rather have a governor who can spend his own money to get elected than one who sees every issue before his government as a chance to build the balance in his campaign fund.

DUMP DAVIS PING PING PING PING PING!!!!!!

34 posted on 05/08/2002 9:28:05 AM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gophack;Grampa Dave;Liz
PARTY! PARTY! PARTY!

RATS governing principle. Too bad it's 'party people', rather than a 'people party'.
35 posted on 05/08/2002 9:38:12 AM PDT by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: randita
Thanks for the ping!

I lost this in the traffic!

36 posted on 05/08/2002 10:03:19 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ;;Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; eureka!; Libertarianize the GOP; TheAngryClam; heleny; quimby...
calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



37 posted on 05/08/2002 10:06:24 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Gophack
This is still Davis' attitude:

Bribery? Hey, how's a Po' Boy gonna get elected these days?

If the price of admission is too high, don't play. Maybe that's not a good thing for Democracy, but instead of taking bribes, he could try to change the rules by legitimate means. But that would mean playing by the rules...

38 posted on 05/08/2002 12:12:29 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson