JUST DON'T ASK ME TO RETURN MY HARD EARNED BRIBES FROM WHOREACLE/LOGICON!
Posted on 05/09/2002 6:17:33 AM PDT by randita
Nice to see this in the Chronicle. Methinks there will be more to come with next week's hearings. My hope of hopes is that Grayout knew about the contract surfaces...
JUST DON'T ASK ME TO RETURN MY HARD EARNED BRIBES FROM WHOREACLE/LOGICON!
The only problem, when your political "in" becomes an "out", your corporation may just go belly up.
Whoreacle lost its "In" with the Clintoon and Jake Reno, the moment GW became president. Now, they have lost their "in" with Lockyer and Benito Davis! Expect to read similiar stories in other states re Whoreacle investing in politicians for big profits.
Polling results are a little slow coming in!!!
 calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register |
Even the San Francisco Chronically Wronicle is forced to write about this! Wow!See also an earlier article (with fewere details) about this:Will the Left Angeles Times be next??? Nah...
HUGH HEWITT SHOW -- Calif. Attorney Gen'l Returns Oracle Contribution (Reuters)
Reuters | 5-8-02 | Reuters
Posted on 5/8/02 6:58 PM Pacific by doug from upland
"...State auditors say the no-bid contract--touted by Oracle and its business partner, Logicon, as a way to save the state more than $100million over 10 years--could cost the state $6 million to $41 million more than it would spend otherwise..."Thanks for YOUR spin, L.A. Times!"...Republican candidate for governor Bill Simon Jr. has made an issue of the $25,000 donation Oracle gave Gov. Gray Davis several days after the contract was signed..."
This policy of removing even the "slightest appearance" of a conflict of interest must have been implemented AFTER the "Spike" incident..."Attorney General Bill Lockyer returned $50,000 in campaign contributions from Oracle on Wednesday, saying he wanted to remove even the "slightest appearance" of a conflict of interest as he probes a state contracting scandal involving the software giant..."
From http://www.pacificresearch.org/pub/cap/2001/01-06-13.html:Vol. 6, No. 21: June 13, 2001
The Energy Crisis, Spike the Tattooed Dude,
and the Case for the Resignation of Bill Lockyer
SACRAMENTO – Bill Lockyer, California’s Attorney General, is an authoritarian thug who should resign. That’s the view of Tom Palmer, a senior fellow of the Cato Institute, based on a statement Lockyer made in a press conference about Kenneth Lay, chairman of Enron Corporation.“I would love to personally escort Lay to an 8-by-10 cell that he could share with a tattooed dude who says ‘Hi, my name is Spike, honey,’” Lockyer said.
Palmer is one of the few to consider the serious implications of that statement. The Attorney General of California is the chief law enforcement official of the most populous state. But as holder of that office, Mr. Lockyer, “not only has admitted that rape is a regular feature of the state’s prison system, but also that he considers rape a part of the punishment he can inflict on others.” What if, Palmer speculates, the head of Enron were female?
Further, Palmer says, “he has publicly stated that he would like to personally arrange the rape of a Texas businessman who has not even been charged with any illegal behavior.” This leads Palmer to conclude that Lockyer is “an authoritarian thug, someone wholly unsuited to holding an office of public trust.”
Lockyer, who sponsored California’s hate-crimes law, singled out Mr. Lay because he is the chairman of a Texas-based company that is the world’s largest energy trader. Apparently, this justifies the appalling threats Lockyer made.
The Attorney General’s statements, says Palmer, reveal what imprisonment really entails in California. But they also symbolize the response of the Davis Administration to the energy crisis.
“Lockyer and Gov. Gray Davis,” says Palmer, “seem to think that the best way to keep the lights on is to threaten electricity producers with brute force, rather than offer to pay competitive rates in competitive markets. Are energy producers to blame for California’s energy problems? No. Bad policies, including rigid controls on retail prices of electricity, are the cause of the problem, not the people who generate energy.”True to form, other leading Democrats, such as Lt. Governor Cruz Bustamante, want to prosecute energy producers under California’s “three-strikes” laws, intended for violent criminals. The Davis Administration views the crisis as entirely due to “price gouging” by Texas energy companies. The approach Attorney General Lockyer is taking, however, is not new, notes Palmer.
“Scapegoating producers and threatening them with violence is an old ploy of authoritarians. Californians should not stand for it.” Palmer, therefore, concludes: “Lockyer’s remarks merit public disgrace and removal from office. After all, rape is not a form of legal justice in America, is it?”
It is of some significance that criminal lobbies such as the ACLU and prisoner-rights groups let the Attorney General’s statement pass without comment. So did editorial writers at major papers around the state, including the Sacramento Bee, a kind of Democratic Party newsletter. At this writing, Mr. Lockyer is still in office and has yet to publish a response. When he does, we will cite it extensively in this column.
– Lloyd Billingsley
Hmmmm... I seem to remember a SIMILAR case that happened recently, where an Attorney General had taken campaign donations from a corporation that he was charged with investigating, and in that case, HE recused himself - to avoid the appearance of impropriety...
From http://www.opensecrets.org/alerts/v6/alertv6_36.asp:
There would therefore SEEM to be a precedent, but perhaps it only applies to Attorneys General with CHARACTER.January 10, 2002 - Attorney General John Ashcroft, who announced today that he will recuse himself from the Justice Department’s criminal probe of fallen energy giant Enron, raised a total of $57,499 from the company for his failed 2000 Senate campaign. Nearly half of that total -- $25,000 – was given by Enron CEO Kenneth Lay to Ashcroft’s joint fund fundraising committee in the form of soft money. The Ashcroft Victory Committee also raised another $25,000 in soft money directly from Enron Corp., bringing the committee’s total take from Enron to $50,000...
The Clintoons for about 8 years supposedly returned campaign money and gifts when caught in something illegal or just stinky. I doubt if any of that money was ever returned.
When do leftwing liberals like Lockyer lie to us!
From my POV out here in flyover?
Really quite clear & very simple, indeed.
It was -- & correct me if I'm wrong -- The PEOPLE of the state of CA who wanted and then elected, this baffoon, to be their Gov.
They got'em, too; in spades.
And for Heaven's sake!
Don'tcha be discounting y'all getting another term of this thieving-weasel, either!!
HA!
Why that screwed-up Lamestream dream-spin machine's at work 24&7 on the guy's behalf to deflect, obfuscate, redirect & redefine everything the imbecile goofed up -- or caught red-handed doing -- during his first go-around.
Before they're finished -- and, they've not eeeeeven begun yet -- this one may very well turn out to be a potential Democratic candidate for POTUS!!
You'll know that though, when you start hearing all kinds of talk about 'em erecting a statue of the clown at the capitol, in Sacramento.
Yea, to celebrate his, "Tremendous Accomplishments" during his terms as CA's political CEO??
That's not me talking, either; what that is though, is a plain, ol' fact of life in 2002.
So I repeat; don't laugh too hard, quite yet.
...or methinks you'd be failing to recognize the sheer depth of stupidity many of your CA neighbors possess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.